Loma Linda University, USA.
Fam Process. 2011 Dec;50(4):516-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2011.01374.x.
Current clinical models for addressing infidelity tend not to make social context issues a central focus; yet, societal gender and power structures, such as female responsibility for relationships and limited male vulnerability, affect the etiology of affairs and create power imbalances in intimate relationships. How therapists respond to these societal influences may either limit or enhance the mutual healing of both persons in the relationship. Thus attention to these societal processes is an ethical issue. This paper presents one perspective, the Relational Justice Approach, for working with infidelity. It places gender, power, and culture at the center of intervention in couple therapy, and includes three stages: (1) creating an equitable foundation for healing, (2) placing the infidelity in a societal context, and (3) practicing mutuality. Each stage is illustrated with case examples and contrasted with current practice regarding infidelity.
当前解决不忠问题的临床模式往往没有将社会背景问题作为核心关注点;然而,社会性别和权力结构,如女性对关系的责任和男性脆弱性的有限,会影响外遇的病因,并在亲密关系中造成权力失衡。治疗师如何应对这些社会影响,可能会限制或增强关系中两个人的共同疗愈。因此,关注这些社会过程是一个伦理问题。本文提出了一种处理不忠问题的视角,即关系公正方法。它将性别、权力和文化置于夫妻治疗干预的中心,包括三个阶段:(1)为疗愈创造公平的基础,(2)将不忠置于社会背景中,(3)实践互惠。每个阶段都用案例进行了说明,并与当前关于不忠的实践进行了对比。