Rehabilitation Research Centre, Discipline of Exercise and Sport Science, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia; Applied Physiology Pty Ltd., Crows Nest, NSW, Australia; and Ottobock Healthcare GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Neuromodulation. 2009 Jul;12(3):180-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2009.00213.x.
Objectives. To investigate the different approaches in the field of functional electrical stimulation (FES) control of gait and address fundamental perquisites to enable FES walking systems to become safer, more practical, and therefore clinically efficacious. Design. Systematic review was conducted from electronic data bases up to March 2008. Studies with innovative control strategies were highlighted for analysis, but all relevant literatures were described to deliver a broad viewpoint. Study Selection. FES studies applying 1) open and closed-loop controllers; 2) control algorithm techniques; or 3) feedback information to the control unit of neuromuscular stimulators via biological signals or artificial sensors. These studies were mostly associated to FES gait. Results. By far, more spinal cord-injured users have benefited from open-loop FES walking systems because they have had an easier and faster setup. However, because of their limitations over the control of knee extension, closed-loop control of gait may be a superior approach. The use of electromyogram to quantify quadriceps fatigue was not considered sufficiently appropriate to predict knee-buckle events; instead, the use of motion sensors for such purposes is recommended. Finite state controllers based on a set of deterministic rules to process feedback signals seemed more suitable to provide accurate command-and-control compared with dynamic or neural network controllers. Conclusions. Progress in the development of closed-loop FES walking systems has been impeded by their lack of practicality. In the near future, this obstacle could be overcome via implanted systems, especially if using controllers based on deterministic rule sets derived from motion sensor feedback.
目的。研究功能性电刺激(FES)控制步态的不同方法,并解决基本的前提条件,使 FES 行走系统更安全、更实用,从而更具临床疗效。
设计。系统评价从电子数据库进行,截止到 2008 年 3 月。突出分析具有创新控制策略的研究,但也描述了所有相关文献,以提供更广泛的观点。
研究选择。FES 研究应用 1)开环和闭环控制器;2)控制算法技术;或 3)通过生物信号或人工传感器将反馈信息传递给神经肌肉刺激器的控制单元。这些研究主要与 FES 步态有关。
结果。到目前为止,更多的脊髓损伤患者受益于开环 FES 行走系统,因为它们的设置更简单、更快。然而,由于它们在控制膝关节伸展方面的局限性,闭环控制步态可能是一种更好的方法。使用肌电图来量化股四头肌疲劳被认为不足以准确预测膝关节弯曲事件;相反,建议使用运动传感器来实现这一目的。基于一组确定性规则来处理反馈信号的有限状态控制器似乎比动态或神经网络控制器更适合提供准确的命令和控制。
结论。闭环 FES 行走系统的发展受到其实用性不足的阻碍。在不久的将来,这一障碍可以通过植入系统来克服,特别是如果使用基于运动传感器反馈的确定性规则集衍生的控制器。