Suppr超能文献

双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的阿立哌唑治疗双相障碍儿童的长期维持研究。

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled long-term maintenance study of aripiprazole in children with bipolar disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals, Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;73(1):57-63. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07104. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the long-term efficacy of aripiprazole compared to placebo in children with bipolar disorders.

METHOD

Outpatients aged 4 to 9 years meeting DSM-IV criteria for a bipolar disorder (I, II, not otherwise specified, cyclothymia) were eligible to receive up to 16 weeks of open-label treatment with aripiprazole (phase 1). Patients were randomized into the 72-week double-blind phase of the study once they met a priori response criteria for stabilization (phase 2). During phase 2, patients either remained on their current aripiprazole regimen or began a double-blind taper with aripiprazole discontinued and switched to placebo. The primary outcome measure for phase 2 was time to discontinuation due to a mood event.

RESULTS

Patients were recruited between May 2004 and November 2008. Following phase 1, in which 96 patients received aripiprazole, 30 patients (mean age = 7.1 years) were randomly assigned to continue aripiprazole and 30 patients (mean age = 6.7 years) were randomly assigned to placebo. The mean (SD) dose of aripiprazole prior to randomization for these patients was 6.4 (2.1) mg/d. Patients randomly assigned to aripiprazole were enrolled significantly longer until time to study discontinuation due to a mood event (6.14 median weeks, SE ± 11.88 weeks; P = .005) and discontinuation for any reason (including mood events) (4.00 median weeks, SE ± 3.91 weeks; P = .003) than those randomly assigned to placebo (mood event, 2.29 median weeks, SE ± 0.38 weeks; any reason, 2.00 median weeks, SE ± 0.31 weeks). Regardless of random assignment, both the aripiprazole and placebo groups showed substantial rates of withdrawal from maintenance treatment over the initial 4 weeks (15/30 [50%] for aripiprazole; 27/30 [90%] for placebo), suggesting a possible nocebo effect (ie, knowledge of possibly switching from active medication to placebo increasing concern about relapse). The most frequently reported adverse events during double-blind aripiprazole therapy included stomach pain (n = 10, 33%), increased appetite (n = 9, 30%), and headaches (n = 9, 30%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the possibility of a nocebo effect, these results suggest that aripiprazole may be superior to placebo in the long-term treatment of pediatric patients following stabilization with open-label aripiprazole.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00194077.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了阿立哌唑与安慰剂相比在双相障碍儿童中的长期疗效。

方法

符合 DSM-IV 双相障碍(I、II、未特定、环性心境障碍)标准的 4 至 9 岁门诊患者有资格接受长达 16 周的阿立哌唑开放标签治疗(第 1 阶段)。一旦患者符合稳定的预先设定反应标准,他们就会被随机分配到研究的 72 周双盲阶段(第 2 阶段)。在第 2 阶段期间,患者要么继续当前的阿立哌唑治疗方案,要么开始接受双盲阿立哌唑减量,停用阿立哌唑并换用安慰剂。第 2 阶段的主要结局测量是由于情绪事件而停药的时间。

结果

患者于 2004 年 5 月至 2008 年 11 月间招募。在第 1 阶段,96 名患者接受了阿立哌唑治疗后,其中 30 名患者(平均年龄=7.1 岁)被随机分配继续接受阿立哌唑治疗,30 名患者(平均年龄=6.7 岁)被随机分配接受安慰剂。这些患者在随机分组前的阿立哌唑平均剂量为 6.4(2.1)mg/d。随机分配到阿立哌唑的患者入组时间显著延长,直到由于情绪事件导致研究停药的时间(6.14 中位数周,SE ± 11.88 周;P=0.005)和任何原因(包括情绪事件)停药的时间(4.00 中位数周,SE ± 3.91 周;P=0.003)均长于随机分配到安慰剂的患者(情绪事件,2.29 中位数周,SE ± 0.38 周;任何原因,2.00 中位数周,SE ± 0.31 周)。无论随机分组如何,阿立哌唑和安慰剂组在最初 4 周内均有大量患者停止维持治疗(阿立哌唑组 15/30 [50%];安慰剂组 27/30 [90%]),这表明可能存在一种反安慰剂效应(即,从活性药物转换为安慰剂可能会增加对复发的担忧)。双盲阿立哌唑治疗期间最常报告的不良事件包括腹痛(n=10,33%)、食欲增加(n=9,30%)和头痛(n=9,30%)。

结论

尽管存在反安慰剂效应的可能性,但这些结果表明,在使用阿立哌唑开放标签稳定治疗后,阿立哌唑可能优于安慰剂,用于长期治疗儿科患者。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00194077。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验