Suppr超能文献

[硬膜外镇痛用于腹膜癌病的手术治疗:一种有风险的技术?]

[Epidural analgesia for surgical treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: a risky technique?].

作者信息

Desgranges F-P, Steghens A, Rosay H, Méeus P, Stoian A, Daunizeau A-L, Pouderoux-Martin S, Piriou V

机构信息

Département d'anesthésie-réanimation, centre régional de lutte contre le cancer Léon-Bérard, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2012 Jan;31(1):53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2011.08.020. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To study the risks of haemodynamic instability, and the possible occurrence of spinal haematoma, meningitis and epidural abscess when epidural analgesia is performed for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 35 patients treated by HIPEC with oxaliplatin or cisplatin. An epidural catheter was inserted before induction of general anaesthesia. Postoperatively, a continuous epidural infusion of ropivacain, then a patient-controlled epidural analgesia were started.

RESULTS

The epidural catheter was used peroperatively before HIPEC in 12 subjects (34%), and after HIPEC in 23 subjects (66%). The median dose of ropivacain given peroperatively in the epidural catheter was 40 mg (30-75). Norepinephrin was used in two subjects (6%) peroperatively (median infusion rate 0.325 μg/kg per minute [0.32-0.33]), and in four subjects (11%) in the postoperative 24 hours. No spinal haematoma, meningitis or epidural abscess were noted. Five subjects (14%) had a thrombopenia or a prothrombin time less than 60% before catheter removal. Two subjects (6%) had a leukopenia before catheter removal. No thrombopenia or blood coagulation disorders were recorded the day of catheter removal.

CONCLUSION

In this series of 35 patients, the use of epidural analgesia for HIPEC does not seem to be associated with a worse risk of haemodynamic instability, spinal haematoma, meningitis or epidural abscess. HIPEC with platinum salt is not incompatible with the safety of epidural analgesia, with an optimized fluid management peroperatively and the following of perimedullary anesthesia practice guidelines.

摘要

背景

研究在减瘤手术和热灌注化疗(HIPEC)中实施硬膜外镇痛时血流动力学不稳定的风险,以及脊髓血肿、脑膜炎和硬膜外脓肿的可能发生情况。

方法

我们回顾性分析了35例接受奥沙利铂或顺铂热灌注化疗患者的数据。在全身麻醉诱导前插入硬膜外导管。术后开始持续硬膜外输注罗哌卡因,然后实施患者自控硬膜外镇痛。

结果

12例患者(34%)在热灌注化疗术前使用硬膜外导管,23例患者(66%)在热灌注化疗术后使用。术中硬膜外导管给予罗哌卡因的中位剂量为40mg(30 - 75mg)。术中2例患者(6%)使用去甲肾上腺素(中位输注速率0.325μg/kg每分钟[0.32 - 0.33]),术后24小时有4例患者(11%)使用。未发现脊髓血肿、脑膜炎或硬膜外脓肿。5例患者(14%)在拔除导管前出现血小板减少或凝血酶原时间低于60%。2例患者(6%)在拔除导管前出现白细胞减少。拔除导管当天未记录到血小板减少或凝血功能障碍。

结论

在这35例患者中,热灌注化疗使用硬膜外镇痛似乎与血流动力学不稳定、脊髓血肿、脑膜炎或硬膜外脓肿的更高风险无关。铂盐热灌注化疗与硬膜外镇痛的安全性并不矛盾,术中优化液体管理并遵循围髓麻醉实践指南即可。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验