Kushner Burton J
Pediatric Ophthalmology and Adult Strabismus, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, 2870 University Ave, Ste 206, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec;129(12):1620-5. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.326.
Insertion slanting recessions or biased resections have been reported to be useful for treating A- and V-pattern strabismus, convergence insufficiency, and convergence excess esotropia. Paradoxically, good results have been reported with methods that are opposite in nature. For example, some researchers would recess the medial rectus muscles and slant the superior pole of each muscle back farther than the inferior pole (Simonsz/von Graefe method) for a V-pattern esotropia, and others would slant the inferior poles back farther (Bietti method). The Simonsz/von Graefe method seems to be based on sound concepts of oculomotor mechanics. The Bietti method has been justified based on a misquoting and misinterpretation of previous work by Alan Scott, MD. Probably neither method contributes substantially to the outcome of strabismus surgery because sarcomere remodeling should rapidly negate the effect of the slanting. Most likely it is the recession or resection itself that affects the outcome.
据报道,内直肌斜后徙术或偏斜切除术可用于治疗A型和V型斜视、集合不足以及集合过强性内斜视。矛盾的是,一些本质上相反的方法也取得了良好的效果。例如,对于V型内斜视,一些研究人员会将内直肌后徙,并将每条肌肉的上极比下极向后倾斜得更远(西蒙斯/冯·格拉费法),而另一些人则会将下极向后倾斜得更远(比耶蒂法)。西蒙斯/冯·格拉费法似乎基于眼动力学的合理概念。比耶蒂法是基于对医学博士艾伦·斯科特先前工作的错误引用和错误解读而被证明合理的。可能这两种方法对斜视手术的结果都没有实质性贡献,因为肌节重塑应该会迅速抵消倾斜的影响。很可能是后徙术或切除术本身影响了手术结果。