Chen Ding-Ping, Tseng Ching-Ping, Wang Wei-Ting, Sun Chien-Feng
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan County, Taiwan.
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2011 Fall;41(4):346-52.
Numerous phenotypes with serologically weak expression of A or B antigen have been found on the surface of red blood cells. Some of these alleles have mutation(s) in the ABO gene coding sequence; most of the mutations are single-nucleotide substitutions leading to an amino acid change. However, these mutated ABO alleles leading to attenuated antigen expression are not well defined. In this study, the cDNAs for the A(1v) and B(1) alleles were first obtained from healthy volunteers and were used as the templates for site-directed mutagenesis to generate expression constructs corresponding to various ABO subtypes including A(1), A(2) (539G>C), A(3) (838C>T), A(1) (829G>A), A(1v) (829G>A), and B(el) (502C>T). K562 erythroleukemia cells were used as the cell study model and were transfected with individual ABO expression constructs. Flow cytometry analysis was then performed to determine the levels of surface antigen expression. Using the relative percentage of antigen-expressing cells as an index for comparison, we found that the levels of A antigen expression for A(1v), A(2) (539G>C), A(3) (838C>T), A(1) (829G>A), and A(1v) (829G>A) were 65.71%, 29.78%, 45.04%, 45.2% and 33.9% of A(1), respectively. Similarly, B antigen expression for B(el) was 90.71% of B(1). The mean fluorescence index (MFI) - defined as the product of percent antigen-expressing cells and the mean cell fluorescence intensity of the population with antigen expression - was also used as an index for comparing the antigen expression level. All ABO subtypes we examined herein displayed a decrease in MFI when compared to A(1) or B(1), respectively. These data thus demonstrate that the point mutation in the coding region of ABO subtypes is fundamental to the weak antigen expression, adding to the complexity of the regulatory mechanisms of ABO gene expression.
在红细胞表面发现了许多A或B抗原血清学弱表达的表型。其中一些等位基因在ABO基因编码序列中存在突变;大多数突变是单核苷酸替换,导致氨基酸改变。然而,这些导致抗原表达减弱的突变ABO等位基因尚未得到明确界定。在本研究中,首先从健康志愿者中获得A(1v)和B(1)等位基因的cDNA,并将其用作定点诱变的模板,以生成对应于各种ABO亚型的表达构建体,包括A(1)、A(2)(539G>C)、A(3)(838C>T)、A(1)(829G>A)、A(1v)(829G>A)和B(el)(502C>T)。K562红白血病细胞用作细胞研究模型,并分别用单个ABO表达构建体进行转染。然后进行流式细胞术分析以确定表面抗原表达水平。以表达抗原的细胞的相对百分比作为比较指标,我们发现A(1v)、A(2)(539G>C)、A(3)(838C>T)、A(1)(829G>A)和A(1v)(829G>A)的A抗原表达水平分别为A(1)的65.71%、29.78%、45.04%、45.2%和33.9%。同样,B(el)的B抗原表达为B(1)的90.71%。平均荧光指数(MFI)——定义为表达抗原细胞的百分比与表达抗原群体的平均细胞荧光强度的乘积——也用作比较抗原表达水平的指标。与A(1)或B(1)相比,我们在此研究的所有ABO亚型的MFI均降低。因此,这些数据表明ABO亚型编码区的点突变是抗原弱表达的根本原因,这增加了ABO基因表达调控机制的复杂性。