Mohammadi Akram, Kinase Sakae, Saito Kimiaki
Medical Radioisotope Application Group, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), 2-4 Shirakata, Shirane, Tokai-mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 Jul;150(3):283-91. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncr419. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
Internal dosimetry in non-human biota is desirable from the viewpoint of radiation protection of the environment. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) proposed Reference Animals and Plants using simplified models, such as ellipsoids and spheres and calculated absorbed fractions (AFs) for whole bodies. In this study, photon and electron AFs in whole bodies of voxel-based rat and frog models have been calculated and compared with AFs in the reference models. It was found that the voxel-based and the reference frog (or rat) models can be consistent for the whole-body AFs within a discrepancy of 25%, as the source was uniformly distributed in the whole body. The specific absorbed fractions (SAFs) and S values were also evaluated in whole bodies and all organs of the voxel-based frog and rat models as the source was distributed in the whole body or skeleton. The results demonstrated that the whole-body SAFs reflect SAFs of all individual organs as the source was uniformly distributed per mass within the whole body by about 30% uncertainties with exceptions for body contour (up to -40%) for both electrons and photons due to enhanced radiation leakages, and for the skeleton for photons only (up to +185%) due to differences in the mass attenuation coefficients. For nuclides such as (90)Y and (90)Sr, which were concentrated in the skeleton, there were large differences between S values in the whole body and those in individual organs, however the whole-body S values for the reference models with the whole body as the source were remarkably similar to those for the voxel-based models with the skeleton as the source, within about 4 and 0.3%, respectively. It can be stated that whole-body SAFs or S values in simplified models without internal organs are not sufficient for accurate internal dosimetry because they do not reflect SAFs or S values of all individual organs as the source was not distributed uniformly in whole body. Thus, voxel-based models would be good candidates for dosimetry in non-human biota if further accuracy in environmental dosimetry is desired.
从环境保护的辐射防护角度来看,非人类生物群的体内剂量测定是很有必要的。国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)提出了参考动植物,使用了椭球体和球体等简化模型,并计算了全身的吸收分数(AFs)。在本研究中,已计算基于体素的大鼠和青蛙模型全身的光子和电子AFs,并与参考模型中的AFs进行了比较。结果发现,当源在全身均匀分布时,基于体素的模型与参考青蛙(或大鼠)模型在全身AFs方面可在25%的差异范围内保持一致。当源分布在全身或骨骼中时,还对基于体素的青蛙和大鼠模型的全身和所有器官的比吸收分数(SAFs)和S值进行了评估。结果表明,由于辐射泄漏增强,对于电子和光子,全身SAFs反映了所有单个器官的SAFs,源在全身每质量均匀分布时,不确定性约为30%,但身体轮廓除外(高达-40%);对于光子,仅骨骼除外(高达+185%),这是由于质量衰减系数的差异。对于诸如(90)Y和(90)Sr等集中在骨骼中的核素,全身S值与单个器官的S值之间存在很大差异,然而,以全身为源的参考模型的全身S值与以骨骼为源的基于体素的模型的全身S值分别在约4%和0.3%的范围内非常相似。可以说,没有内部器官的简化模型中的全身SAFs或S值不足以进行准确的体内剂量测定,因为它们没有反映源在全身不均匀分布时所有单个器官的SAFs或S值。因此,如果希望在环境剂量测定中获得更高的准确性,基于体素的模型将是用于非人类生物群体内剂量测定的良好选择。