Amwell Group Practice, 4 Naoroji Street, London WC1X 0GB, UK.
J Med Ethics. 2012 May;38(5):281-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100187. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
This paper presents the case of a young man with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, who agreed to inpatient treatment primarily to avoid being formally detained. I draw on Peter Breggin's early critique of coercion of informal patients to supply an updated discussion of the ethical issues raised. Central questions are whether the admission was coercive, and if so, whether unethical. Whether or not involuntary admission would be justified, moral discomfort surrounds its appearance as a threat. This arises in part from ambivalence about autonomy: although a 'choice' is made, the threat of detention impinges on the patient's choice. Recent legal developments provide some experience of safeguarding those whose consent is not obtained. This highlights the lack of safeguards in this 'gap' and suggests that we have the tools with which to begin to deal with the problem.
这篇论文介绍了一个年轻男子的案例,他被诊断患有精神分裂症,最初同意住院治疗主要是为了避免被正式拘留。我借鉴了 Peter Breggin 早期对非自愿住院患者的强制治疗的批评,对所引发的伦理问题进行了更新讨论。核心问题是入院是否具有强制性,如果是,是否不道德。无论非自愿入院是否合理,其作为一种威胁的出现都会引起道德上的不安。这在一定程度上源于对自主权的矛盾态度:尽管做出了“选择”,但拘留的威胁会影响患者的选择。最近的法律发展为保护那些没有获得同意的人提供了一些经验。这凸显了这一“空白”中缺乏保障措施的问题,并表明我们有工具可以开始解决这个问题。