相似文献
1
Introduction: quality, technology, and outcomes in radiation oncology.
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jan;22(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2011.10.001.
2
A clinical approach to technology assessment: how do we and how should we choose the right treatment?
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jan;22(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2011.09.008.
3
Quality, technology and outcomes: evolution and evaluation of new treatments and/or new technology.
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jan;22(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2011.09.009.
4
Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: Equipment development is stifling innovation in radiation oncology.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Sep;20(9):6-11. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12620. Epub 2019 May 25.
5
A new golden age.
Adm Radiol J. 1996 Jun;15(6):40-2.
6
Is Equipment Development Stifling Innovation in Radiation Oncology?
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jul 15;92(4):713-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.03.005.
7
[Oncologic radiotherapy].
Bull Cancer. 2010 Jul;97(7):737-8. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2010.1158.
8
[Trends in medical radiation physics. Outlook for radiation oncology].
Rontgenpraxis. 1992 Aug;45(8):270-6.
9
Process enhancement by using MultiLeaf Collimator (MLC) technology.
J Oncol Manag. 1998 Sep-Oct;7(5):26-32.
10
[Evaluation and quality assurance of equipment in radiation oncology].
Bull Cancer Radiother. 1996;83 Suppl 2:242s-272s.
Zotero 插件