Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 May;22(4):413-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
BACKGROUND: Recently, high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) and low-frequency rTMS (LF-rTMS) are reported to improve motor function significantly in chronic hemiparetic stroke patients. However, few studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of these rTMS modalities introduced during the early phase of stroke. The purpose of this study was to clarify the rTMS modality that is more beneficial for upper limb hemiparesis in the early phase of stroke using a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with a hemispheric stroke lesion in the early phase of stroke were examined. Patients were randomly assigned into 3 groups: the HF-rTMS group (10 Hz rTMS to the lesional hemisphere [n = 9]), the LF-rTMS group (1 Hz rTMS to the nonlesional hemisphere [n = 11]), and the sham stimulation group [n = 9]). Patients received sessions for 5 consecutive days. Grip strength and tapping frequency were assessed before and after the intervention. Motor improvement of the affected upper limb after intervention was compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS: All patients completed the 5-day protocol. Both the HF-rTMS and LF-rTMS groups had significant increases in both grip strength and tapping frequency. Comparison of the extent of improvement showed a more significant increase in grip strength and tapping frequency in the HF-rTMS group compared to the sham stimulation group (each P < .05), and no difference between the LF-rTMS group and the sham stimulation group. CONCLUSIONS: HF-rTMS applied to the lesional hemisphere in the early phase of stroke was more beneficial for motor improvement of the affected upper limb than LF-rTMS.
背景:高频重复经颅磁刺激(HF-rTMS)和低频 rTMS(LF-rTMS)最近被报道可显著改善慢性偏侧性中风患者的运动功能。然而,很少有研究调查在中风早期引入这些 rTMS 模式的安全性和有效性。本研究旨在通过随机对照试验阐明在中风早期哪种 rTMS 模式对上肢偏瘫更有益。
方法:检查了 29 名处于中风早期的半球性中风病变患者。患者被随机分为 3 组:HF-rTMS 组(10 Hz rTMS 刺激病灶半球[n = 9])、LF-rTMS 组(1 Hz rTMS 刺激非病灶半球[n = 11])和假刺激组[n = 9])。患者接受连续 5 天的治疗。干预前后评估握力和敲击频率。比较 3 组干预后患侧上肢运动改善情况。
结果:所有患者均完成了 5 天的方案。HF-rTMS 和 LF-rTMS 组的握力和敲击频率均显著增加。比较改善程度,HF-rTMS 组的握力和敲击频率增加幅度明显大于假刺激组(各 P <.05),而 LF-rTMS 组与假刺激组之间无差异。
结论:在中风早期,将 HF-rTMS 应用于病灶半球对患侧上肢运动功能的改善比 LF-rTMS 更有益。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016-7