• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架置入术用于一级和二级卒中预防。

Carotid artery stenting for primary and secondary stroke prevention.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2011 Dec;76(6 Suppl):S40-59. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.06.019.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2011.06.019
PMID:22182271
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid artery disease is a major cause of the disability and mortality associated with strokes. Ischemic stroke remains the major cause of adult disability and third-leading cause of adult mortality, and carotid revascularization currently remains the principal surgical tool in the prophylaxis of this disease.

METHODS

The literature representing the current body of evidence for carotid revascularization and the authors' current practices in the management of this disease are summarized in this review.

RESULTS

We provide an evidence-based narration of the development and current status of carotid artery stenting (CAS) by reviewing 1) the evidence for carotid revascularization from early carotid endarterectomy (CEA) trials; 2) the randomized trials comparing CEA and CAS, with a special emphasis on the recently published results of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST), which have been a "game-changer," tipping the balance towards accepting CAS as a safe, equally effective, and durable alternative to CEA for all patients requiring carotid revascularization; and 3) the technical advances in CAS after enrollment of patients in the CREST.

CONCLUSIONS

CAS and CEA are complementary procedures. Judicious selection of the procedure is made on a case-by-case basis.

摘要

背景

颈动脉疾病是导致中风相关残疾和死亡的主要原因。缺血性中风仍然是导致成人残疾的主要原因,也是成人死亡的第三大原因,颈动脉血运重建术目前仍然是预防这种疾病的主要手术手段。

方法

本综述总结了目前颈动脉血运重建术的证据和作者在治疗这种疾病方面的当前实践。

结果

通过回顾 1)早期颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)试验中颈动脉血运重建的证据;2)比较 CEA 和 CAS 的随机试验,特别强调最近发表的颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)的结果,我们提供了颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的循证叙述,这一试验结果改变了局面,使 CAS 作为所有需要颈动脉血运重建的患者的一种安全、同样有效和持久的 CEA 替代方法被接受;3)在 CREST 试验纳入患者后,CAS 的技术进展。

结论

CAS 和 CEA 是互补的程序。应根据具体情况明智地选择手术。

相似文献

1
Carotid artery stenting for primary and secondary stroke prevention.颈动脉支架置入术用于一级和二级卒中预防。
World Neurosurg. 2011 Dec;76(6 Suppl):S40-59. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.06.019.
2
Carotid artery stenting for stroke prevention.颈动脉支架置入术预防脑卒中。
Can J Cardiol. 2014 Jan;30(1):22-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.09.030. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
3
Carotid endarterectomy was performed with lower stroke and death rates than carotid artery stenting in the United States in 2003 and 2004.2003年和2004年在美国,颈动脉内膜切除术的实施带来的中风和死亡率低于颈动脉支架置入术。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;46(6):1112-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.08.030.
4
Carotid artery revascularization.颈动脉血运重建术
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003 Fall;10(3):46-60. doi: 10.1310/JAUJ-REKW-95G2-G2HJ.
5
Secondary stroke prevention in the era of carotid stenting: update on recent trials.
Arch Surg. 2010 Oct;145(10):928-35. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.204.
6
Recent concepts in the management of extracranial carotid stenosis: carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting.近期关于颅外颈动脉狭窄的治疗理念:颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术。
Neurol India. 2011 May-Jun;59(3):376-82. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.82741.
7
Carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Aug 19;64(7):722-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.069.
8
Carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting? Matching the patient to the intervention.颈动脉内膜切除术还是颈动脉支架置入术?使患者与干预措施相匹配。
Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2010 Jun;22(2):124-36. doi: 10.1177/1531003510381136.
9
Carotid artery stenting has increased rates of postprocedure stroke, death, and resource utilization than does carotid endarterectomy in the United States, 2005.在美国2005年,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,颈动脉支架置入术增加了术后中风、死亡及资源利用的发生率。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Dec;48(6):1442-50, 1450.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.017. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
10
How I interpreted the randomised trials of carotid angioplasty/stenting versus endarterectomy.我如何解读颈动脉血管成形术/支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的随机试验。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Jul;36(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Adventitia Layer-Focused Microsurgical Flow Reconstruction for Long-Segment Tubular Stenosis of the Cervical Segment (C1) Internal Carotid Artery: Clinical Valuable Experience in 20 Cases.针对颈段(C1)颈内动脉长段管状狭窄的外膜层聚焦显微外科血流重建:20例临床宝贵经验
Brain Sci. 2024 Mar 19;14(3):289. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14030289.
2
How much medicine do spine surgeons need to know to better select and care for patients?脊柱外科医生需要了解多少医学知识才能更好地选择和治疗患者?
Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3(Suppl 5):S329-49. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.103866. Epub 2012 Nov 26.