Paul Jasmeet S, Neideen Todd, Tutton Sean, Milia David, Tolat Parag, Foley Dennis, Brasel Karen
Division of Trauma/Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1519-23. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823b9811.
An increasing number of minimal aortic injuries (MAIs) are being identified with modern computed tomography (CT) imaging techniques. The optimal management and natural history of these injuries are unknown. We have adopted a policy of selective multidisciplinary nonoperative management of MAI. This study examines our experience with these patients from July 2004 to June 2009.
Retrospective chart review of all blunt trauma patients who underwent chest CT angiography to evaluate for blunt aortic injury (BAI) was undertaken. All patients deemed to have a MAI were managed nonoperatively, and those with a severe aortic injury underwent repair. Data collected included age, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, type and location of aortic injury, intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), overall LOS, ventilator days, disposition, and mortality. In addition, all BAIs were graded according to the Presley Trauma Center CT Grading System of Aortic Injury.
Forty-seven patients with BAI were identified. Thirty-two were classified as severe injuries, and 15 were considered MAI (32%). Nineteen underwent operative repair, 13 underwent endovascular stent graft repair, and 15 were managed nonoperatively. The average Injury Severity Score was 31 ± 10, and the average age was 44 ± 20 with no significant difference across treatment groups. There was no difference in overall or intensive care unit LOS. The nonoperative group had a shorter duration of ventilator days (1.1 vs. 4.28, p = 0.02). There were five deaths, none in the nonoperative group. None of these patients required subsequent intervention. All nonoperative patients had follow-up imaging at median of 4 days; on CT chest angiography, five injuries had resolved, eight had stable intimal flaps or pseudoaneurysm, and two had no detectable injury on subsequent aortogram.
Almost one-third of our BAI were safely managed nonoperatively. Patients with MAI should be considered for selective nonoperative management in a multidisciplinary approach with close radiographic follow-up. We recommend that patients with MAIs should be considered for selective nonoperative management.
随着现代计算机断层扫描(CT)成像技术的应用,越来越多的轻微主动脉损伤(MAI)被发现。这些损伤的最佳治疗方法和自然病程尚不清楚。我们采取了对MAI进行选择性多学科非手术治疗的策略。本研究调查了2004年7月至2009年6月期间我们对这些患者的治疗经验。
对所有因钝性主动脉损伤(BAI)而接受胸部CT血管造影的钝性创伤患者进行回顾性病历审查。所有被认为患有MAI的患者均接受非手术治疗,而那些患有严重主动脉损伤的患者则接受修复手术。收集的数据包括年龄、损伤机制、损伤严重程度评分、主动脉损伤的类型和位置、重症监护病房住院时间(LOS)、总住院时间、呼吸机使用天数、出院情况和死亡率。此外,所有BAI均根据普雷斯利创伤中心主动脉损伤CT分级系统进行分级。
共识别出47例BAI患者。32例被归类为严重损伤,15例被认为是MAI(32%)。19例接受了手术修复,13例接受了血管内支架植入修复,15例接受了非手术治疗。平均损伤严重程度评分为31±10,平均年龄为44±20,各治疗组之间无显著差异。总住院时间或重症监护病房住院时间无差异。非手术组的呼吸机使用天数较短(1.1天对4.28天,p = 0.02)。有5例死亡,非手术组无死亡病例。这些患者均无需后续干预。所有非手术患者在中位时间4天进行了随访影像学检查;在胸部CT血管造影中,5处损伤已愈合,8处有稳定的内膜瓣或假性动脉瘤,2处在后续主动脉造影中未发现损伤。
我们几乎三分之一的BAI患者通过非手术治疗获得了安全管理。对于MAI患者,应考虑采用多学科方法进行选择性非手术治疗,并进行密切的影像学随访。我们建议对MAI患者应考虑进行选择性非手术治疗。