Department of Microbiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals and University of Leeds, UK.
Injury. 2011 Dec;42 Suppl 5:S42-4. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(11)70132-2.
There is a choice of anti-MRSA antibiotic available with proven efficacy in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI). Additional anti-MRSA antibiotics are in development, which have the potential to influence how such infections are managed. The emergence of resistance to current anti-MRSA agents, toxicity, and general lack of oral agents with proven efficacy for deep seated infection justify the development of new agents. However, there is a relative dearth of information specific to patients with orthopaedic-related infection. Combination therapy is often used in these patients, although there is a paucity of controlled trial data to support particular antibiotic combinations. As the choice of anti-MRSA agents increases, so does the need to identify which are best for the large variety of infections included in the group of cSSSIs. This is particular true for infections occurring in orthopaedic patients where poorly vascularised tissue, trauma or implanted prosthetic material, pose specific challenges.
有多种抗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)抗生素可供选择,这些抗生素已被证实可有效治疗复杂性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(cSSSI)。此外,还有多种抗 MRSA 抗生素正在开发中,这有可能影响此类感染的治疗方式。目前抗 MRSA 药物的耐药性、毒性以及缺乏针对深部感染的口服有效药物,都证明了开发新药物的合理性。然而,针对与骨科相关感染的患者,相关信息相对较少。尽管缺乏支持特定抗生素组合的对照试验数据,但联合治疗通常用于这些患者。随着抗 MRSA 药物选择的增加,我们需要确定哪些药物最适合包括在 cSSSIs 组中的各种感染。对于发生在骨科患者中的感染尤其如此,因为这些患者的组织血供较差、存在创伤或植入的假体材料,这带来了特定的挑战。