Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yongan Road, Xuanwu District, Beijing 100050, People's Republic of China.
Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Apr;57(4):897-904. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1981-7. Epub 2011 Dec 25.
Circulating microRNA expression profiles may be promising biomarkers for diagnosis and assessment of the prognosis of cancer patients. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is a sensitive technique for estimating expression levels of circulating microRNAs. However, there is no current consensus on the reference genes for qPCR analysis of circulating microRNAs.
In this study we tried to identify suitable reference genes for qPCR analysis of serum microRNA in gastric cancer patients and healthy individuals.
Six microRNAs (let-7a, miR-16, miR-93, miR-103, miR-192, and miR-451) and RNU6B were chosen as candidate reference genes on the basis of the literature. Expression levels of these candidates were analyzed by qPCR in serum samples from 40 gastric cancer patients and 20 healthy volunteers. The geNorm, Normfinder, bestkeeper, and comparative delta-Ct method algorithms were used to select the most suitable reference gene from the seven candidates. This was then validated by normalizing the expression levels of serum miR-21 across all gastric cancer patients and healthy volunteers.
The algorithms revealed miR-16 and miR-93 were the most stably expressed reference genes, with stability values of 1.778 and 2.213, respectively, for serum microRNA analysis across all the patients and healthy controls. The effect of different normalization strategies was compared; when normalized to the serum volume there were no significant differences between patients and controls. However, when the data were normalized to miR-93, miR-16, or miR-93 and miR-16 combined, significant differences were detected.
Our results demonstrated that reference gene choice for qPCR data analysis has a great effect on the study outcome, and that it is necessary to choose a suitable reference for reliable expression data. We recommend miR-16 and miR-93 as suitable reference genes for serum miRNA analysis for gastric cancer patients and healthy controls.
循环 microRNA 表达谱可能是癌症患者诊断和预后评估有前途的生物标志物。实时定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)是一种用于估计循环 microRNA 表达水平的敏感技术。然而,目前对于 qPCR 分析循环 microRNA 的参考基因尚无共识。
本研究旨在确定用于胃癌患者和健康个体血清 microRNA qPCR 分析的合适参考基因。
根据文献选择了 6 个 microRNA(let-7a、miR-16、miR-93、miR-103、miR-192 和 miR-451)和 RNU6B 作为候选参考基因。通过 qPCR 分析 40 名胃癌患者和 20 名健康志愿者血清样本中这些候选基因的表达水平。使用 geNorm、Normfinder、bestkeeper 和 comparative delta-Ct 方法算法从 7 个候选基因中选择最合适的参考基因。然后通过对所有胃癌患者和健康志愿者的血清 miR-21 表达水平进行归一化来验证。
算法显示 miR-16 和 miR-93 是最稳定的参考基因,其在所有患者和健康对照者血清 microRNA 分析中的稳定性值分别为 1.778 和 2.213。比较了不同归一化策略的效果;当按血清体积归一化时,患者和对照组之间没有显著差异。然而,当数据按 miR-93、miR-16 或 miR-93 和 miR-16 组合归一化时,检测到显著差异。
我们的结果表明,qPCR 数据分析中参考基因的选择对研究结果有很大影响,因此有必要选择合适的参考基因以获得可靠的表达数据。我们建议 miR-16 和 miR-93 作为胃癌患者和健康对照者血清 miRNA 分析的合适参考基因。