Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen, Norway.
J Rehabil Med. 2012 Mar;44(3):272-5. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0930.
To investigate face and construct validity of the Gait Deviation Index (GDI) in adults with spastic cerebral palsy. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was used as a framework, defining gait and walking as the manner or style of walking ("body function"), and the execution of gait ("activity"), respectively.
A cross-sectional study.
66 adults with spastic cerebral palsy, mean age 37 years, and previously collected data on 50 healthy adults (reference population).
GDI from three-dimensional gait analysis, Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), 6-min walk test (6MWT), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and Physiological Cost Index (PCI).
Mean GDI was 74.3 in adults with cerebral palsy, and 101.1 in the reference population. A significant difference in GDI was found between the reference population and GMFCS level I (p < 0.001), between I and II (p < 0.001), but not between II and III (p = 0.633). The associations between GDI and 6MWT, TUG and PCI were r = 0.30, r = -0.30, and r = -0.56, respectively.
GDI demonstrated similar distributional properties as those reported in children with cerebral palsy, suggesting satisfactory face validity. Low correlations between GDI and 6MWT/TUG reflect that gait and functional walking/mobility are different constructs, implicating the importance of selecting outcomes in all ICF domains when evaluating walking ability in adults with spastic cerebral palsy.
研究痉挛性脑瘫成人步态偏差指数(GDI)的表面效度和结构效度。本研究以《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)为框架,将步态和行走定义为行走的方式或风格(“身体功能”)和步态的执行(“活动”)。
横断面研究。
66 名痉挛性脑瘫成人,平均年龄 37 岁,之前收集了 50 名健康成人(参考人群)的数据。
三维步态分析的 GDI、粗大运动功能分级系统(GMFCS)、6 分钟步行试验(6MWT)、计时起立行走测试(TUG)和生理消耗指数(PCI)。
脑瘫成人的平均 GDI 为 74.3,参考人群为 101.1。参考人群与 GMFCS Ⅰ级(p<0.001)、Ⅰ级与Ⅱ级(p<0.001)之间的 GDI 差异有统计学意义,但Ⅱ级与Ⅲ级之间的 GDI 差异无统计学意义(p=0.633)。GDI 与 6MWT、TUG 和 PCI 之间的相关性分别为 r=0.30、r=-0.30 和 r=-0.56。
GDI 表现出与脑瘫儿童相似的分布特征,提示具有良好的表面效度。GDI 与 6MWT/TUG 之间的低相关性反映了步态和功能性行走/移动是不同的结构,这意味着在评估痉挛性脑瘫成人的行走能力时,应在 ICF 所有领域中选择结局。