Department of Food Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
J Food Prot. 2012 Jan;75(1):14-21. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-084.
Numerous antimicrobial interventions are capable of reducing the prevalence of harmful bacteria on raw meat products. There is a need to identify effective and inexpensive antimicrobial interventions that could, in practice, be used in very small meat plants because of limited financial, space, and labor resources. Eight antimicrobial compounds (acetic acid, citric acid, lactic acid, peroxyacetic acid, acidified sodium chlorite, chlorine dioxide, sodium hypochlorite, and aqueous ozone) were applied at various concentrations with small, hand-held spraying equipment, and bactericidal effectiveness was examined. Beef plate pieces were inoculated with fecal slurry containing a pathogen cocktail (Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium, Campylobacter coli, and Campylobacter jejuni) and natural populations of aerobic plate counts, coliforms, and E. coli. Antimicrobial solutions were applied to beef surfaces via a portable, pressurized hand-held spray tank, and treated surfaces were subjected to appropriate methods for the enumeration and isolation of pathogens and hygiene indicators. Relative antimicrobial effectiveness was determined (from greatest to least): (i) organic acids, (ii) peroxyacetic acid, (iii) chlorinated compounds, and (iv) aqueous ozone. Using the equipment described, a 2% lactic acid rinse provided 3.5- to 6.4-log CFU/cm(2) reductions across all bacterial populations studied. Conversely, aqueous ozone yielded 0.02- to 2.9-log CFU/cm(2) reductions in pathogens and hygiene indicators, and did not differ significantly from a control tap water rinse (P = 0.055 to 0.731). This 2% lactic acid rinse will be subsequently combined with a previously described water wash to create a multistep antimicrobial intervention that will be examined under laboratory conditions and validated in very small meat plants.
许多抗菌干预措施能够降低生肉产品中有害细菌的流行率。需要确定有效的、廉价的抗菌干预措施,由于资金、空间和劳动力资源有限,这些措施实际上可以在非常小的肉类加工厂中使用。八种抗菌化合物(乙酸、柠檬酸、乳酸、过氧乙酸、酸化亚氯酸钠、二氧化氯、次氯酸钠和臭氧水)用小型手动喷雾设备以不同浓度应用,并检查杀菌效果。牛肉板片用含有病原体混合物(大肠杆菌 O157:H7、鼠伤寒沙门氏菌、弯曲杆菌 coli 和空肠弯曲菌)和需氧平板计数、大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的天然菌群的粪便浆液接种。抗菌溶液通过便携式加压手动喷雾罐应用于牛肉表面,并用适当的方法处理处理过的表面,以对病原体和卫生指标进行计数和分离。相对抗菌效果(从最大到最小)确定为:(i)有机酸,(ii)过氧乙酸,(iii)氯化化合物,(iv)臭氧水。使用所描述的设备,2%乳酸冲洗可提供 3.5-6.4-log CFU/cm(2)对所有研究细菌种群的减少。相比之下,臭氧水在病原体和卫生指标方面产生 0.02-2.9-log CFU/cm(2)的减少,与对照自来水冲洗无显著差异(P=0.055 至 0.731)。随后,这种 2%乳酸冲洗将与之前描述的水冲洗相结合,创建一个多步抗菌干预措施,将在实验室条件下进行检查,并在非常小的肉类加工厂中进行验证。