Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Lancet. 2012 Feb 18;379(9816):641-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61750-9. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
Skin and mucosal herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) shedding predominantly occurs in short subclinical episodes. We assessed whether standard-dose or high-dose antiviral therapy reduces the frequency of such shedding.
HSV-2-seropositive, HIV-seronegative people were enrolled at the University of Washington Virology Research Clinic (WA, USA). We did three separate but complementary open-label cross-over studies comparing no medication with aciclovir 400 mg twice daily (standard-dose aciclovir), valaciclovir 500 mg daily (standard-dose valaciclovir) with aciclovir 800 mg three times daily (high-dose aciclovir), and standard-dose valaciclovir with valaciclovir 1 g three times daily (high-dose valaciclovir). The allocation sequence was generated by a random number generator. Study drugs were supplied in identical, numbered, sealed boxes. Study periods lasted 4-7 weeks, separated by 1 week wash-out. Participants collected genital swabs four times daily for quantitative HSV DNA PCR. Clinical data were masked from laboratory personnel. The primary endpoint was within-person comparison of shedding rate in each study group. Analysis was per protocol. The trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00362297, NCT00723229, NCT01346475).
Of 113 participants randomised, 90 were eligible for analysis of the primary endpoint. Participants collected 23 605 swabs; 1272 (5·4%) were HSV-positive. The frequency of HSV shedding was significantly higher in the no medication group (n=384, 18·1% of swabs) than in the standard-dose aciclovir group (25, 1·2%; incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0·05, 95% CI 0·03-0·08). High-dose aciclovir was associated with less shedding than standard-dose valaciclovir (198 [4·2%] vs 209 [4·5%]; IRR 0·79, 95% CI 0·63-1·00). Shedding was less frequent in the high-dose valaciclovir group than in the standard-dose valaciclovir group (164 [3·3%] vs 292 [5·8%]; 0·54, 0·44-0·66). The number of episodes per person-year did not differ significantly for standard-dose valaciclovir (22·6) versus high-dose aciclovir (20·2; p=0·54), and standard-dose valaciclovir (14·9) versus high-dose valaciclovir (16·5; p=0·34), but did for no medication (28·7) and standard-dose aciclovir (10·0; p=0·001). Median episode duration was longer for no medication than for standard-dose aciclovir (13 h vs 7 h; p=0·01) and for standard-dose valaciclovir than for high-dose valaciclovir (10 h vs 7 h; p=0·03), but did not differ significantly between standard-dose valaciclovir and high-dose aciclovir (8 h vs 8 h; p=0·23). Likewise, maximum log(10) copies of HSV detected per mL was higher for no medication than for standard dose aciclovir (3·3 vs 2·9; p=0·02), and for standard-dose valaciclovir than for high-dose valaciclovir (2·5 vs 3·0; p=0·001), but no significant difference was recorded for standard-dose valaciclovir versus high-dose aciclovir (2·7 vs 2·8; p=0·66). 80% of episodes were subclinical in all study groups. Except for a higher frequency of headaches with high-dose valaciclovir (n=13, 30%) than with other regimens, all regimens were well tolerated.
Short bursts of subclinical genital HSV reactivation are frequent, even during high-dose antiherpes therapy, and probably account for continued transmission of HSV during suppressive antiviral therapy. More potent antiviral therapy is needed to eliminate HSV transmission.
NIH. Valaciclovir was provided for trial 3 for free by GlaxoSmithKline.
皮肤和黏膜单纯疱疹病毒 2 型(HSV-2)的脱落主要发生在短暂的亚临床发作中。我们评估了标准剂量或高剂量抗病毒治疗是否能降低这种脱落的频率。
在华盛顿大学病毒学研究诊所(美国华盛顿州)招募了 HSV-2 血清阳性、HIV 血清阴性的人群。我们进行了三项独立但互补的开放性交叉研究,比较了无药物治疗与阿昔洛韦 400mg 每日两次(标准剂量阿昔洛韦)、伐昔洛韦 500mg 每日一次(标准剂量伐昔洛韦)与阿昔洛韦 800mg 每日三次(高剂量阿昔洛韦),以及标准剂量伐昔洛韦与伐昔洛韦 1g 每日三次(高剂量伐昔洛韦)。分配序列由随机数发生器产生。研究药物以相同编号的密封盒供应。研究期持续 4-7 周,间隔 1 周洗脱期。参与者每天采集 4 次生殖器拭子进行定量 HSV DNA PCR。临床数据对实验室人员保密。主要终点是每个研究组脱落率的个体内比较。分析是按方案进行的。这些试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册(NCT00362297、NCT00723229、NCT01346475)。
在 113 名随机分配的参与者中,90 名符合主要终点分析的条件。参与者采集了 23605 份拭子;1272 份(5.4%)为 HSV 阳性。无药物治疗组(n=384,占拭子的 18.1%)的 HSV 脱落频率明显高于标准剂量阿昔洛韦组(25,1.2%;发病率比[IRR]0.05,95%CI 0.03-0.08)。高剂量阿昔洛韦与标准剂量伐昔洛韦相比,脱落率较低(198[4.2%]比 209[4.5%];IRR 0.79,95%CI 0.63-1.00)。高剂量伐昔洛韦组的脱落率低于标准剂量伐昔洛韦组(164[3.3%]比 292[5.8%];0.54,0.44-0.66)。标准剂量伐昔洛韦与高剂量阿昔洛韦(22.6 比 20.2;p=0.54)和标准剂量伐昔洛韦与高剂量伐昔洛韦(14.9 比 16.5;p=0.34)相比,标准剂量伐昔洛韦的发作次数/人年差异无统计学意义,但与无药物治疗(28.7 比 10.0;p=0.001)相比,差异有统计学意义。无药物治疗组的发作持续时间中位数长于标准剂量阿昔洛韦(13 小时比 7 小时;p=0.01)和标准剂量伐昔洛韦(10 小时比 7 小时;p=0.03),但与高剂量伐昔洛韦相比无显著差异(8 小时比 8 小时;p=0.23)。同样,无药物治疗组的 HSV 最大对数 10 拷贝/ml 检测值高于标准剂量阿昔洛韦(3.3 比 2.9;p=0.02)和高剂量伐昔洛韦(2.5 比 3.0;p=0.001),但标准剂量伐昔洛韦与高剂量阿昔洛韦之间无显著差异(2.7 比 2.8;p=0.66)。所有研究组的 80%的发作均为亚临床发作。除高剂量伐昔洛韦组(n=13,30%)比其他方案更常见头痛外,所有方案均耐受良好。
生殖器单纯疱疹病毒短暂的亚临床再激活是频繁发生的,即使在高剂量抗病毒治疗期间也是如此,这可能是在抑制性抗病毒治疗期间持续传播单纯疱疹病毒的原因。需要更有效的抗病毒治疗来消除单纯疱疹病毒的传播。
NIH。伐昔洛韦是由葛兰素史克公司免费提供用于试验 3 的。