• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别再次心脏移植后发生移植物失败的高危受者。

Identifying recipients at high risk for graft failure after heart retransplantation.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Mar;93(3):712-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.10.065. Epub 2012 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.10.065
PMID:22226492
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify recipient factors that are associated with a high risk of graft failure after heart retransplantation (HRT).

METHODS

The prospectively collected United Network for Organ Sharing registry was used to identify patients undergoing HRT among 24,477 patients who had undergone cardiac transplantation between 1997 and 2009. The primary outcome was graft failure within 1 year of HRT. The impact of 35 recipient variables on the primary outcome was tested in exploratory univariate logistic regression analysis. Those factors found to be significantly associated with graft failure were entered into a multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 671 patients underwent HRT during the study period. Overall, 302 (45%) grafts failed after HRT at a mean follow-up of 4.3±3.7 years. Three recipient factors were found to be associated with 1-year graft failure in the multivariate model: older age, increasing serum creatinine, and mechanical ventilation before HRT. Moreover, each decade increase in recipient age was associated with a 20% increase in odds of 1-year graft failure (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.04; p=0.005). Similarly, each 1-mg/dL increase in serum creatinine increased odds of graft failure by 58% (odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 1.97; p<0.001). Patients who were mechanically ventilated had a fourfold higher likelihood of 1-year graft failure (odds ratio, 4.32; 95% confidence interval, 2.28 to 8.18; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of graft failure after HRT increases with an increasing number of significant recipient risk factors, namely older age, increasing serum creatinine, and mechanical ventilation. These risk factors should serve as relative contraindications to HRT, especially when present in combination, given the higher rate of graft failure in these patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定心脏再次移植(HRT)后发生移植物衰竭的高风险的受者因素。

方法

使用前瞻性收集的 United Network for Organ Sharing 登记处,确定 1997 年至 2009 年间接受心脏移植的 24477 例患者中进行 HRT 的患者。主要结局是 HRT 后 1 年内移植物衰竭。在探索性单变量逻辑回归分析中测试 35 个受者变量对主要结局的影响。将与移植物衰竭显著相关的因素纳入多变量逻辑回归模型。

结果

研究期间共有 671 例患者接受 HRT。总体而言,在平均 4.3±3.7 年的随访中,HRT 后 302(45%)个移植物衰竭。在多变量模型中,有 3 个受者因素与 1 年移植物衰竭相关:年龄较大、血清肌酐升高和 HRT 前机械通气。此外,受者年龄每增加 10 年,1 年移植物衰竭的几率增加 20%(优势比,1.02;95%置信区间,1.01 至 1.04;p=0.005)。同样,血清肌酐每增加 1mg/dL,移植物衰竭的几率增加 58%(优势比,1.58;95%置信区间,1.27 至 1.97;p<0.001)。接受机械通气的患者 1 年移植物衰竭的可能性高 4 倍(优势比,4.32;95%置信区间,2.28 至 8.18;p<0.001)。

结论

HRT 后移植物衰竭的风险随着受者危险因素数量的增加而增加,这些危险因素主要包括年龄较大、血清肌酐升高和机械通气。这些危险因素应作为 HRT 的相对禁忌证,尤其是在这些患者中,移植物衰竭的发生率较高时。

相似文献

1
Identifying recipients at high risk for graft failure after heart retransplantation.识别再次心脏移植后发生移植物失败的高危受者。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Mar;93(3):712-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.10.065. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
2
Factors associated with 5-year survival in older heart transplant recipients.与老年心脏移植受者 5 年生存率相关的因素。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;143(2):468-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.036.
3
Cardiac retransplantation in childhood: analysis of data from the United Network for Organ Sharing.儿童心脏再次移植:器官共享联合网络数据分析
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Aug;130(2):542-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.02.050.
4
Creation of a quantitative recipient risk index for mortality prediction after cardiac transplantation (IMPACT).创建心脏移植后死亡率预测的定量受体风险指数 (IMPACT)。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Sep;92(3):914-21; discussion 921-2. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.04.030.
5
Retransplantation for late liver graft failure: predictors of mortality.晚期肝移植失败后的再次移植:死亡率的预测因素
Liver Transpl. 2000 Mar;6(2):174-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.500060222.
6
Hepatitis C is a risk factor for death after liver retransplantation.丙型肝炎是肝脏再次移植后死亡的一个风险因素。
Liver Transpl. 2005 Apr;11(4):434-40. doi: 10.1002/lt.20342.
7
Cardiac retransplantation: is it justified in times of critical donor organ shortage? Long-term single-center experience.心脏再次移植:在供体器官严重短缺时期是否合理?单中心长期经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Dec;34(6):1185-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.06.044. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
8
Liver transplantation in the United States: a report from the UNOS Liver Transplant Registry.美国的肝移植:器官共享联合网络肝脏移植登记处的一份报告。
Clin Transpl. 1999:23-34.
9
A United Network for Organ Sharing analysis of heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease: outcomes and factors associated with mortality and retransplantation.美国器官共享联合网络对成人先天性心脏病心脏移植的分析:死亡率和再次移植相关的结局和因素。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.036.
10
What predicts long-term survival after heart transplantation? An analysis of 9,400 ten-year survivors.什么因素可预测心脏移植后的长期生存?一项对 9400 名十年幸存者的分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Mar;93(3):699-704. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.09.037. Epub 2012 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Heart Retransplant Recipients Have Better Survival With Concurrent Kidney Transplant Than With Heart Retransplant Alone.心脏再次移植受者接受同期肾脏移植的生存率高于单纯心脏再次移植。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Dec 11;4(12):e002435. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002435.
2
Results of heart transplantation in the urgent recipient--who should be transplanted?紧急心脏移植受者的移植结果——谁适合接受移植?
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2014 Jul-Sep;29(3):379-87. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20140072.
3
Preoperative assessment of high-risk candidates to predict survival after heart transplantation.
术前高危候选者评估以预测心脏移植后的生存率。
Circ Heart Fail. 2013 May;6(3):527-34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000092. Epub 2013 Mar 15.