Department of Adult Health, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Menopause. 2012 Jun;19(6):664-71. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31823dbbe3.
The aim of this study was to evaluate monitors for assessing vasomotor symptoms (VMS) in laboratory and ambulatory settings before use in the Menopause Strategies Finding Lasting Answers for Symptoms and Health network clinical trials testing VMS therapies.
This was a three-phase study. Phase 1 included laboratory testing of the Freedman and prototype Bahr Monitor, phase 2 included laboratory testing of the commercial Bahr Monitor and Biolog, and phase 3 included ambulatory testing of the commercial Bahr Monitor and Biolog. All phases enrolled midlife women with VMS, midlife women without VMS, and young women without VMS. The participants self-reported VMS by pressing event marker buttons. Questionnaires assessed demographics (all phases) and monitor acceptability (phases 2 and 3).
Phase I testing was stopped because of sensitivity of the Freedman device to ambient humidity changes and lack of analytic software for the prototype Bahr Monitor. In phases 2 and 3, agreement between event-marked and commercial Bahr Monitor or Biolog-recorded VMS was higher in the laboratory than in the ambulatory setting; however, agreement between monitors was poor in two of three laboratory groups (midlife no VMS and young no VMS) and in all ambulatory groups. During ambulatory monitoring, the mean number of Bahr Monitor VMS was 16.33 in midlife women with VMS, 9.61 in midlife women without VMS, and 14.63 in young women without VMS (software version, March 2011). The Bahr Monitor was more acceptable than the larger Biolog, but feedback reflected annoyance at having to wear a device that itched and was visible under clothing.
The Bahr Monitor and Biolog seem suitable for use in controlled laboratory conditions during short periods of time. However, the current versions of these monitors may not be suitable for ambulatory clinical trials at this time.
本研究旨在评估血管舒缩症状(VMS)监测仪在实验室和动态环境中的性能,以便在绝经策略寻找症状和健康网络临床试验中用于测试 VMS 治疗方法之前使用。
这是一项三阶段研究。第 1 阶段包括对 Freedman 和原型 Bahr 监测仪进行实验室测试,第 2 阶段包括对商业 Bahr 监测仪和 Biolog 进行实验室测试,第 3 阶段包括对商业 Bahr 监测仪和 Biolog 进行动态监测。所有阶段都招募了有 VMS 的中年女性、无 VMS 的中年女性和无 VMS 的年轻女性。参与者通过按下事件标记按钮来自我报告 VMS。问卷评估了人口统计学数据(所有阶段)和监测仪的可接受性(第 2 和第 3 阶段)。
由于 Freedman 设备对环境湿度变化敏感且原型 Bahr 监测仪缺乏分析软件,第 1 阶段的测试被停止。在第 2 和第 3 阶段,与事件标记和商业 Bahr 监测仪或 Biolog 记录的 VMS 相比,实验室中的一致性高于动态监测;然而,在两个实验室组(无 VMS 的中年女性和无 VMS 的年轻女性)和所有动态监测组中,监测仪之间的一致性都很差。在动态监测期间,有 VMS 的中年女性的 Bahr 监测仪 VMS 平均数量为 16.33,无 VMS 的中年女性为 9.61,无 VMS 的年轻女性为 14.63(软件版本,2011 年 3 月)。Bahr 监测仪比更大的 Biolog 更受欢迎,但反馈反映出佩戴发痒且在衣服下可见的设备的烦恼。
Bahr 监测仪和 Biolog 似乎适合在短时间内用于受控的实验室条件。然而,目前这些监测仪的版本可能不适合在此刻进行动态临床试验。