Ludwig Boltzmann Institut-Health Technology Assessment.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Jan;28(1):77-84. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000729. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
Health technology assessment (HTA) was established in Austria in the 1990s and, since then, it has gained considerable importance. In this study, we aim to analyze whether the HTA reports that have been produced at the Institute for Technology Assessment (ITA) and at the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for HTA (LBI-HTA) have had an impact on decision making within the Austrian health care system.
We selected all reports that were intended for supporting (i) reimbursement/investment or (ii) disinvestment decisions. Eleven full HTA reports and fifty-eight rapid assessments fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We used interview data and administrative data on volumes, tariffs and expenditure of products/services to analyze whether and how reports were in reality used in decision making and what the consequences for health care expenditure and resource distribution have been.
Five full HTA reports and fifty-six rapid technology assessments were used for reimbursement decisions. Four full HTA reports and two rapid assessments were used for disinvestment decisions and resulted in reduced volumes and expenditure. Two full HTA reports showed no impact on decision making. Impact was most evident for hospital technologies.
HTA has played some role in reducing volumes of over-supplied hospital technologies, resulting in reduced expenditure for several hospital providers. Additionally, it has been increasingly included in prospective planning and reimbursement decisions of late, indicating re-distribution of resources toward evidence-based technologies. However, further factors may have influenced the decisions, and the impact could be considerably increased by systematically incorporating HTA into the decision-making process in Austria.
奥地利于 20 世纪 90 年代建立了卫生技术评估(HTA)体系,此后其重要性日益凸显。本研究旨在分析奥地利卫生保健系统的决策是否受到奥地利技术评估研究所(ITA)和路德维希·博尔茨曼卫生技术评估研究所(LBI-HTA)制作的 HTA 报告的影响。
我们选择了所有旨在支持(i)报销/投资或(ii)撤资决策的报告。11 份完整的 HTA 报告和 58 份快速评估符合纳入标准。我们使用访谈数据和产品/服务数量、价格和支出的行政数据,分析报告在决策中是否以及如何实际使用,以及对医疗保健支出和资源分配有何影响。
5 份完整的 HTA 报告和 56 份快速技术评估用于报销决策。4 份完整的 HTA 报告和 2 份快速评估用于撤资决策,导致数量和支出减少。2 份完整的 HTA 报告对决策没有影响。影响最明显的是医院技术。
HTA 在减少过度供应的医院技术数量方面发挥了一定作用,导致多家医院供应商的支出减少。此外,HTA 最近越来越多地被纳入前瞻性规划和报销决策中,表明资源正在向基于证据的技术重新分配。然而,可能还有其他因素影响了决策,如果奥地利系统地将 HTA 纳入决策过程,其影响可能会显著增加。