• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生技术评估报告对奥地利决策的影响。

The impact of health technology assessment reports on decision making in Austria.

机构信息

Ludwig Boltzmann Institut-Health Technology Assessment.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Jan;28(1):77-84. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000729. Epub 2012 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462311000729
PMID:22233544
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Health technology assessment (HTA) was established in Austria in the 1990s and, since then, it has gained considerable importance. In this study, we aim to analyze whether the HTA reports that have been produced at the Institute for Technology Assessment (ITA) and at the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for HTA (LBI-HTA) have had an impact on decision making within the Austrian health care system.

METHODS

We selected all reports that were intended for supporting (i) reimbursement/investment or (ii) disinvestment decisions. Eleven full HTA reports and fifty-eight rapid assessments fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We used interview data and administrative data on volumes, tariffs and expenditure of products/services to analyze whether and how reports were in reality used in decision making and what the consequences for health care expenditure and resource distribution have been.

RESULTS

Five full HTA reports and fifty-six rapid technology assessments were used for reimbursement decisions. Four full HTA reports and two rapid assessments were used for disinvestment decisions and resulted in reduced volumes and expenditure. Two full HTA reports showed no impact on decision making. Impact was most evident for hospital technologies.

CONCLUSIONS

HTA has played some role in reducing volumes of over-supplied hospital technologies, resulting in reduced expenditure for several hospital providers. Additionally, it has been increasingly included in prospective planning and reimbursement decisions of late, indicating re-distribution of resources toward evidence-based technologies. However, further factors may have influenced the decisions, and the impact could be considerably increased by systematically incorporating HTA into the decision-making process in Austria.

摘要

目的

奥地利于 20 世纪 90 年代建立了卫生技术评估(HTA)体系,此后其重要性日益凸显。本研究旨在分析奥地利卫生保健系统的决策是否受到奥地利技术评估研究所(ITA)和路德维希·博尔茨曼卫生技术评估研究所(LBI-HTA)制作的 HTA 报告的影响。

方法

我们选择了所有旨在支持(i)报销/投资或(ii)撤资决策的报告。11 份完整的 HTA 报告和 58 份快速评估符合纳入标准。我们使用访谈数据和产品/服务数量、价格和支出的行政数据,分析报告在决策中是否以及如何实际使用,以及对医疗保健支出和资源分配有何影响。

结果

5 份完整的 HTA 报告和 56 份快速技术评估用于报销决策。4 份完整的 HTA 报告和 2 份快速评估用于撤资决策,导致数量和支出减少。2 份完整的 HTA 报告对决策没有影响。影响最明显的是医院技术。

结论

HTA 在减少过度供应的医院技术数量方面发挥了一定作用,导致多家医院供应商的支出减少。此外,HTA 最近越来越多地被纳入前瞻性规划和报销决策中,表明资源正在向基于证据的技术重新分配。然而,可能还有其他因素影响了决策,如果奥地利系统地将 HTA 纳入决策过程,其影响可能会显著增加。

相似文献

1
The impact of health technology assessment reports on decision making in Austria.卫生技术评估报告对奥地利决策的影响。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Jan;28(1):77-84. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000729. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
2
Assessing the impact of health technology assessment on the Austrian healthcare system.评估卫生技术评估对奥地利医疗体系的影响。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Jan;29(1):84-91. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000748. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
3
Austria: history of health technology assessment during the past 20 years.奥地利:过去20年的卫生技术评估历史
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25 Suppl 1:74-81. doi: 10.1017/S026646230909045X. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
4
Pre-coverage assessments of new hospital interventions on Austria: methodology and 3 years of experience.奥地利新医院干预措施的覆盖前评估:方法学和 3 年经验。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Apr;28(2):171-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000025.
5
[How can the impact of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in the Austrian healthcare system be assessed? Design of a conceptual framework].[如何评估卫生技术评估(HTA)在奥地利医疗保健系统中的影响?一个概念框架的设计]
Gesundheitswesen. 2012 Apr;74(4):257-65. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270503. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
6
Resource allocation and health technology assessment in Australia: views from the local level.澳大利亚的资源分配与卫生技术评估:地方层面的观点
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Apr;25(2):134-40. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090187. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
7
Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions.用于资源分配决策的卫生技术评估改进实施的关键原则。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Summer;24(3):244-58; discussion 362-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462308080343.
8
Health technology assessment and primary data collection for reducing uncertainty in decision making.卫生技术评估与原始数据收集以减少决策中的不确定性
J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 May;6(5):332-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.01.012.
9
A preliminary survey on the influence of rapid health technology assessments.快速卫生技术评估的影响初步调查
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25(3):415-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990067.
10
[Experiences with and impact of health technology assessment on the German Standing Committee of physicians and patients].[卫生技术评估对德国医师与患者常设委员会的影响及相关经验]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2002 Feb;96(2):82-90.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic effects of priority setting in healthcare: a scoping review of current evidence.医疗保健中的优先级设置的经济影响:当前证据的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 18;14(11):e086342. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086342.
2
Introduction of hospital-based health technology assessment in China: experiences from seven pilot hospitals.中国医院为基础的卫生技术评估介绍:来自七个试点医院的经验。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Jan 29;40(1):e20. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323002738.
3
Identifying priority questions regarding rapid systematic reviews' methods: protocol for an eDelphi study.
确定快速系统评价方法优先问题:一项电子德尔菲研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 7;13(7):e069856. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069856.
4
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before.健康政策和体系决策的快速审查:比以往任何时候都更加重要。
Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 30;11(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01887-7.
5
Avoiding health technology assessment: a global survey of reasons for not using health technology assessment in decision making.规避卫生技术评估:关于决策过程中不采用卫生技术评估原因的全球调查
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Sep 22;19(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00308-1.
6
Assessing the performance of health technology assessment (HTA) agencies: developing a multi-country, multi-stakeholder, and multi-dimensional framework to explore mechanisms of impact.评估卫生技术评估(HTA)机构的绩效:构建一个多国、多利益相关方和多维度的框架以探索影响机制。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Jul 2;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00290-8.
7
Development and evolution of medical technology management in China.中国医学技术管理的发展与演变
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Jul 20;132(14):1739-1741. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000314.
8
Establishment of a Quantitative Medical Technology Evaluation System and Indicators within Medical Institutions.医疗机构内定量医学技术评估体系和指标的建立。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Jun 5;131(11):1327-1332. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.232804.
9
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 9: conceptualising disinvestment in the local healthcare setting.通过有效分配资源实现医疗保健可持续性(SHARE)9:对当地医疗环境中的撤资进行概念化。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 8;17(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2507-6.
10
The impact on healthcare, policy and practice from 36 multi-project research programmes: findings from two reviews.36个多项目研究计划对医疗保健、政策及实践的影响:两项综述的结果
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Mar 28;15(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0191-y.