Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UU, UK.
James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK.
New Phytol. 2012 Mar;193(4):948-958. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.04020.x. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
Although dynamic, plant competition is usually estimated as biomass differences at a single, arbitrary time; resource capture is rarely measured. This restricted approach perpetuates uncertainty. To address this problem, we characterized the competitive dynamics of Dactylis glomerata and Plantago lanceolata as continuous trajectories of biomass production and nitrogen (N) capture. Plants were grown together or in isolation. Biomass and N content were measured at 17 harvests up to 76 d after sowing. Data were fitted to logistic models to derive instantaneous growth and N capture rates. Plantago lanceolata was initially more competitive in terms of cumulative growth and N capture, but D. glomerata was eventually superior. Neighbours reduced maximum biomass, but influenced both maximum N capture and its rate constant. Timings of maximal instantaneous growth and N capture rates were similar between species when they were isolated, but separated by 16 d when they were competing, corresponding to a temporal convergence in maximum growth and N capture rates in each species. Plants processed N and produced biomass differently when they competed. Biomass and N capture trajectories demonstrated that competitive outcomes depend crucially on when and how 'competition' is measured. This potentially compromises the interpretation of conventional competition experiments.
尽管植物竞争是动态的,但通常仅在单一任意时间点通过生物量差异来估计;而对资源获取的测量则很少进行。这种受限的方法使不确定性长期存在。为了解决这个问题,我们将鸭茅和车前草的竞争动态描述为生物量产生和氮(N)获取的连续轨迹。植物被种植在一起或单独种植。在播种后 76 天内进行了 17 次收获,测量了生物量和 N 含量。数据拟合逻辑模型以得出瞬时生长和 N 捕获率。车前草在累积生长和 N 捕获方面最初更具竞争力,但鸭茅最终更占优势。邻居会降低最大生物量,但会影响最大 N 捕获及其速率常数。当它们单独生长时,两种物种的最大瞬时生长和 N 捕获率的时间相似,但当它们竞争时则相差 16 天,这对应于每个物种的最大生长和 N 捕获率的时间收敛。当植物竞争时,它们会以不同的方式处理 N 和产生生物量。生物量和 N 捕获轨迹表明,竞争结果取决于何时以及如何测量“竞争”,这对传统竞争实验的解释构成了挑战。