Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine, Public Health, G5/325 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):968-976.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.120. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
The Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two devices for carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in patients at high risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA): (1) a new embolic protection device, the Emboshield Pro (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Ill), using the periprocedural composite end point of 30-day death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (DSMI), and (2) a carotid stent in conjunction with an embolic protection device (EPD) using the DSMI periprocedural composite end point plus ipsilateral stroke at up to 3 years for long-term evaluation.
This prospective, multicenter clinical trial enrolled 220 consecutive participants between November 29, 2006, and January 14, 2008, followed by a second cohort of 102 participants between January 14 and June 18, 2008. Enrolled participants had carotid stenosis (symptomatic >50% or asymptomatic >80%). The first 220 subjects underwent distal EPD placement with a new large-diameter filter, and the second cohort of 102 underwent placement of an older EPD that is no longer manufactured. All 322 participants were to be treated with a dedicated carotid stent with a tapered, small, closed-cell design (Xact; Abbott Vascular) and were to be included in the long-term evaluation. Independent neurologic assessment was performed before CAS and at 1 day, 30 days, and annually after CAS. All primary end point events were independently adjudicated by a central committee.
The periprocedural composite end point of DSMI (95% confidence interval) in the first 220 participants was 2.3% (0.74%, 5.22%), with a combined death and stroke rate of 1.8% (0.50%, 4.59%) and a rate of death and major stroke of 0.5% (0.01%, 2.51%). As of January 3, 2011, the median follow-up for the entire 322-subject cohort for the long-term evaluation was 2.8 years. Freedom from the periprocedural composite of DSMI plus ipsilateral stroke thereafter was 95.4%, with an annualized ipsilateral stroke rate of 0.4%.
CAS outcomes in patients at high risk for CEA have improved from earlier carotid stent trials. With periprocedural rates of DSMI of 2.3%, death or stroke at 1.8%, and death or major stroke rate of 0.5%, PROTECT has the lowest rate of periprocedural complications among other comparable single-arm CAS trials in patients at high risk for CEA.
为了评估两种颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)设备在颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)高危患者中的安全性和有效性,进行了高风险颈动脉内膜切除术患者的颈动脉支架置入术保护(PROTECT)研究:(1)一种新的栓塞保护装置,即 Emboshield Pro(雅培血管,雅培公园,伊利诺伊州),使用 30 天内死亡、中风和心肌梗死(DSMI)的围手术期复合终点,(2)颈动脉支架联合栓塞保护装置(EPD),使用围手术期复合终点 DSMI 加同侧中风,最长可达 3 年进行长期评估。
这项前瞻性、多中心临床试验于 2006 年 11 月 29 日至 2008 年 1 月 14 日期间连续纳入 220 名参与者,随后于 2008 年 1 月 14 日至 6 月 18 日期间纳入第二组 102 名参与者。入组参与者有颈动脉狭窄(症状性>50%或无症状性>80%)。前 220 名患者接受新的大直径过滤器的远端 EPD 放置,第二组 102 名患者接受不再生产的旧 EPD 放置。所有 322 名患者均接受专用颈动脉支架治疗,支架具有锥形、小、闭孔设计(Xact;雅培血管),并将纳入长期评估。在 CAS 前和 CAS 后 1 天、30 天和每年进行独立的神经学评估。所有主要终点事件均由中央委员会进行独立裁决。
前 220 名参与者的围手术期复合终点 DSMI(95%置信区间)为 2.3%(0.74%,5.22%),联合死亡率和中风率为 1.8%(0.50%,4.59%),死亡率和主要中风率为 0.5%(0.01%,2.51%)。截至 2011 年 1 月 3 日,整个 322 名患者队列的长期评估中位随访时间为 2.8 年。此后,围手术期复合终点 DSMI 加同侧中风的无事件生存率为 95.4%,同侧中风年发生率为 0.4%。
高危 CEA 患者的 CAS 结果已从早期颈动脉支架试验中得到改善。在围手术期 DSMI 发生率为 2.3%、1.8%的死亡或中风发生率和 0.5%的死亡或主要中风发生率的情况下,PROTECT 在高危 CEA 患者的其他可比单臂 CAS 试验中具有最低的围手术期并发症发生率。