Department of Computing, Imperial College London, UK.
Proteomics. 2012 Feb;12(4-5):550-63. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201100321. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
Proteomics provides important information--that may not be inferable from indirect sources such as RNA or DNA--on key players in biological systems or disease states. However, it suffers from coverage and consistency problems. The advent of network-based analysis methods can help in overcoming these problems but requires careful application and interpretation. This review considers briefly current trends in proteomics technologies and understanding the causes of critical issues that need to be addressed--i.e., incomplete data coverage and inter-sample inconsistency. On the coverage issue, we argue that holistic analysis based on biological networks provides a suitable background on which more robust models and interpretations can be built upon; and we introduce some recently developed approaches. On consistency, group-based approaches based on identified clusters, as well as on properly integrated pathway databases, are particularly useful. Despite that protein interactions and pathway networks are still largely incomplete, given proper quality checks, applications and reasonably sized data sets, they yield valuable insights that greatly complement data generated from quantitative proteomics.
蛋白质组学提供了关于生物系统或疾病状态中的关键参与者的重要信息——这些信息可能无法从 RNA 或 DNA 等间接来源推断出来。然而,它存在覆盖范围和一致性问题。基于网络的分析方法的出现可以帮助克服这些问题,但需要谨慎应用和解释。这篇综述简要考虑了当前蛋白质组学技术的趋势,并了解了需要解决的关键问题的原因——即数据覆盖范围不完整和样本间不一致。关于覆盖范围问题,我们认为基于生物网络的整体分析为建立更稳健的模型和解释提供了合适的背景;我们介绍了一些最近开发的方法。关于一致性,基于已识别聚类的基于组的方法以及适当集成的途径数据库特别有用。尽管蛋白质相互作用和途径网络仍然在很大程度上不完整,但经过适当的质量检查、应用和合理大小的数据集,它们提供了有价值的见解,极大地补充了从定量蛋白质组学产生的数据。