Suppr超能文献

在诗里拉吉医院,比较仿制静脉注射奥美拉唑(泽弗克)与原研奥美拉唑(洛赛克)在辅助治疗非静脉曲张性上消化道出血方面的疗效和安全性。

Comparison of the efficacy and safety between generic intravenous omeprazole (Zefxon) and original omeprazole (Losec) in the adjunct treatment of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Siriraj Hospital.

作者信息

Lohsiriwat Darin, Saejong Ratikorn, Lohsiriwat Varut, Tongsai Sasima, Thamlikitkul Visanu

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Nov;94(11):1357-64.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical efficacy and safety of generic omeprazole have not been well studied in Thailand.

OBJECTIVE

Determine whether generic omeprazole (Zefxon) is inferior to original omeprazole (Losec) in the treatment of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in Siriraj Hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Medical records of adult patients with the diagnosis of non-variceal UGIB receiving intravenous omeprazole (either Zefxon or Losec) in Siriraj Hospital between January 2006 and September 2010 were reviewed Noninferiority study was used to investigate whether the generic omeprazole was no more than 10% less effective than the original omeprazole. The primary endpoints were recurrent bleeding and mortality within seven and 30 days. Surgery, endoscopic retreatment, blood transfusions, length of hospital stay and safety were also analyzed

RESULTS

Of 200 randomly selected patients in each group, there was no difference in age, gender co-morbidities, severity of UGIB, endoscopic findings and endoscopic intervention between patients receiving generic omeprazole and original omeprazole. Overall rate of recurrent bleeding, mortality, and surgical intervention within 30 days were 12.3%, 5.5% and 2.0%, respectively. The rates of recurrent bleeding, overall mortality, and non-variceal UGIB related mortality within seven and 30 days were not significantly different between the two groups. Neither were the rates of endoscopic retreatment and surgery. The incidence of adverse side effects was 3.5% in each group. Cox regression analysis showed no significant association between type of omeprazole and recurrent bleeding or mortality. Compared to the original omeprazole, the hazard ratio of recurrent bleeding, overall mortality, and non-variceal UGIB related mortality in patients receiving generic omeprazole was 1.44 (95% CI 0.82-2.53; p = 0.21), 2.12 (95% CI 0.90-5.43; p = 0.08) and 1.82 (95% CI 0.53-6.21; p = 0.34), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although the original omeprazole Losec tended to have more favorable outcomes in the treatment of non-variceal UGIB in the present study, non-inferiority test showed that the efficacy and safety of the generic omeprazole Zefxon was not inferior to those of the original omeprazole.

摘要

背景

在泰国,普通奥美拉唑的临床疗效和安全性尚未得到充分研究。

目的

确定在诗里拉吉医院治疗非静脉曲张性上消化道出血(UGIB)时,普通奥美拉唑(Zefxon)是否劣于原研奥美拉唑(洛赛克)。

材料与方法

回顾了2006年1月至2010年9月期间在诗里拉吉医院诊断为非静脉曲张性UGIB并接受静脉注射奥美拉唑(Zefxon或洛赛克)的成年患者的病历。采用非劣效性研究来调查普通奥美拉唑的疗效是否比原研奥美拉唑低不超过10%。主要终点为7天和30天内的再出血和死亡率。还分析了手术、内镜再治疗、输血、住院时间和安全性。

结果

每组随机选择200例患者,接受普通奥美拉唑和原研奥美拉唑的患者在年龄、性别、合并症、UGIB严重程度、内镜检查结果和内镜干预方面无差异。30天内的再出血、死亡率和手术干预总发生率分别为12.3%、5.5%和2.0%。两组在7天和30天内的再出血率、总死亡率和非静脉曲张性UGIB相关死亡率无显著差异。内镜再治疗率和手术率也无显著差异。每组的不良反应发生率均为3.5%。Cox回归分析显示奥美拉唑类型与再出血或死亡率之间无显著关联。与原研奥美拉唑相比,接受普通奥美拉唑的患者再出血、总死亡率和非静脉曲张性UGIB相关死亡率的风险比分别为1.44(95%CI 0.82 - 2.53;p = 0.21)、2.12(95%CI 0.90 - 5.43;p = 0.08)和1.82(95%CI 0.53 - 6.21;p = 0.34)。

结论

尽管在本研究中,原研奥美拉唑洛赛克在治疗非静脉曲张性UGIB方面似乎有更有利的结果,但非劣效性试验表明普通奥美拉唑Zefxon的疗效和安全性不劣于原研奥美拉唑

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验