Université de Bordeaux, U657, France.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jul;74(1):189-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04184.x.
• Metabolic disturbances represent a well-known side effect of second generation antipsychotics. However, studies comparing second generation antipsychotic drugs (SGAPs) and first generation antipsychotic drugs (FGAPs) through administrative databases have shown contrasting findings, which may be attributable to methodological differences.
• The definition of antipsychotic exposure impacts on the association between antipsychotics and metabolic risk in studies carried out through administrative databases. • Considering cumulative exposure to antipsychotics or including patients exposed to an antipsychotic drug for months or years is likely to over-represent patients who tolerate the drug well with a depletion of susceptible effects. • Antipsychotic drug exposure is a time-varying determinant and episodes of no use, past use and current use should be distinguished over the study period to avoid any misclassification bias that might lead to misleading findings.
To assess the influence of three definitions of antipsychotic exposure on the comparison between first generation (FGAP) and second generation (SGAP) antipsychotic drugs and 'conventional' mood stabilizers towards the risk of metabolic events using (i) a dichotomous measure (exposed/non-exposed over the follow-up), (ii) a categorical measure taking into account the chronology of exposure at the time of the metabolic event (current, recent and no use) and (iii) a continuous measure (cumulative duration).
A historical fixed cohort was identified from the 2004-2006 claims database of the French health insurance programme for self-employed workers, including 3172 patients aged 18 years and over who used conventional mood stabilizers over a 3 month period. A metabolic event was defined as an incident dispensing of an anti-diabetic or lipid-lowering drug.
A metabolic event occurred in 367 patients (11.6%). At least one FGAP had been prescribed in 29% of patients who did not develop a metabolic event and in 22% of patients who developed a metabolic event. In addition, at least one SGAP had been prescribed in 12% of patients who did not develop a metabolic event and in 7% of patients who developed a metabolic event. Compared with conventional mood stabilizers, the risk of a metabolic event was negatively associated with exposure to SGAPs over the follow-up period (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.34, 0.82, P= 0.004), positively associated with recent, but not current, exposure to SGAPs (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2, 3.7, P= 0.006) and not associated with cumulative duration of SGAPs (HR 1.001, 95% CI 0.999, 1.003, P= 0.20).
The definition of exposure to antipsychotics in epidemiological studies exploring their metabolic impact is of paramount importance in understanding this association. Different definitions can lead to opposite and seemingly nonsensical results. Not taking into account past exposure, in order to minimize the depletion of susceptible effects, may lead to absurd results.
代谢紊乱是第二代抗精神病药物的一个众所周知的副作用。然而,通过行政数据库比较第二代抗精神病药物(SGAPs)和第一代抗精神病药物(FGAPs)的研究得出了相互矛盾的结果,这可能归因于方法学上的差异。
抗精神病药物暴露的定义影响了通过行政数据库进行的研究中抗精神病药物与代谢风险之间的关联。
考虑到抗精神病药物的累积暴露或包括接受抗精神病药物治疗数月或数年的患者,可能会过度代表耐受药物的患者,而对易感性影响的评估则不足。
抗精神病药物暴露是一个随时间变化的决定因素,在研究期间应区分无使用、过去使用和当前使用的发作,以避免可能导致误导性发现的任何分类偏差。
使用(i)二项措施(随访期间暴露/非暴露)、(ii)考虑到代谢事件发生时暴露时间顺序的分类措施(当前、近期和无使用)和(iii)连续措施(累积持续时间),评估三种抗精神病药物暴露定义对抗精神病药物(FGAP)和第二代(SGAP)与“常规”情绪稳定剂之间代谢事件风险的比较的影响。
从法国自营职业者健康保险计划 2004-2006 年的索赔数据库中确定了一个历史固定队列,包括 3172 名年龄在 18 岁及以上的患者,他们在 3 个月内使用了常规情绪稳定剂。代谢事件定义为抗糖尿病或降脂药物的新处方。
在 367 名患者(11.6%)中发生了代谢事件。在未发生代谢事件的患者中,至少使用了一种 FGAP,占 29%,而在发生代谢事件的患者中,这一比例为 22%。此外,在未发生代谢事件的患者中,至少使用了一种 SGAP,占 12%,而在发生代谢事件的患者中,这一比例为 7%。与常规情绪稳定剂相比,SGAP 暴露与随访期间代谢事件的风险呈负相关(HR 0.53,95%CI 0.34,0.82,P=0.004),与 SGAP 的近期暴露呈正相关,但与当前暴露无关(HR 2.1,95%CI 1.2,3.7,P=0.006),与 SGAP 的累积持续时间无关(HR 1.001,95%CI 0.999,1.003,P=0.20)。
在探索抗精神病药物代谢影响的流行病学研究中,抗精神病药物暴露的定义对于理解这种关联至关重要。不同的定义可能会导致相反的、看似不合理的结果。为了最小化易感效应的枯竭,不考虑过去的暴露可能会导致荒谬的结果。