• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.窄带成像与传统白光结肠镜检查在结直肠息肉检测中的应用比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD008361. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008361.pub2.
2
Dietary fibre for the prevention of recurrent colorectal adenomas and carcinomas.膳食纤维用于预防复发性结直肠腺瘤和癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 8;1(1):CD003430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003430.pub2.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
4
Chromoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for the detection of polyps in the colon and rectum.染色内镜检查与传统内镜检查在结肠和直肠息肉检测中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 7;4(4):CD006439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006439.pub4.
5
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
6
Acupuncture for the prevention of episodic migraine.针刺预防发作性偏头痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 28;2016(6):CD001218. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001218.pub3.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
9
Narrow band imaging versus white light cystoscopy alone for transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.窄带成像与单纯白光膀胱镜检查用于非肌层浸润性膀胱癌经尿道切除术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 8;4(4):CD014887. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014887.pub2.
10
Glucocorticosteroids for people with alcoholic hepatitis.用于酒精性肝炎患者的糖皮质激素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 2;11(11):CD001511. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001511.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Specific Targeting and Labeling of Colonic Polyps in Mice with Mucin 5AC Fluorescent Antibodies: A Model for Detection of Early Colon Cancer.用粘蛋白5AC荧光抗体对小鼠结肠息肉进行特异性靶向和标记:一种早期结肠癌检测模型
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023 Apr 11;45(4):3347-3358. doi: 10.3390/cimb45040219.
2
Mucosal imaging in colon polyps: New advances and what the future may hold.结肠息肉的黏膜成像:新进展和未来可能的发展方向。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 21;28(47):6632-6661. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i47.6632.
3
Detection of colorectal adenomas with texture and color enhancement imaging: Multicenter observational study.利用纹理和色彩增强成像检测结直肠腺瘤:多中心观察性研究。
Dig Endosc. 2023 May;35(4):529-537. doi: 10.1111/den.14480. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
4
Highlighting the Undetectable - Fluorescence Molecular Imaging in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.突出不可见的部分 - 荧光分子内镜成像在胃肠道内镜中的应用。
Mol Imaging Biol. 2023 Feb;25(1):18-35. doi: 10.1007/s11307-022-01741-1. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
5
Narrow band imaging versus white light for detecting sessile serrated lesion: A prospective randomized multicenter study.窄带成像与白光用于检测无蒂锯齿状病变:一项前瞻性随机多中心研究。
DEN Open. 2021 Sep 1;2(1):e44. doi: 10.1002/deo2.44. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Electronic chromo-endoscopy: technical details and a clinical perspective.电子染色内镜检查:技术细节与临床展望。
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jan 25;7:6. doi: 10.21037/tgh-19-373. eCollection 2022.
7
A protease-activated, near-infrared fluorescent probe for early endoscopic detection of premalignant gastrointestinal lesions.一种蛋白酶激活的近红外荧光探针,用于早期内镜检测癌前胃肠道病变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 5;118(1). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008072118.
8
Optical imaging technology in colonoscopy: Is there a role for photometric stereo?结肠镜检查中的光学成像技术:光度立体法有作用吗?
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 May 16;12(5):138-148. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i5.138.
9
Advanced Endoscopic Imaging in Colonic Neoplasia.结肠肿瘤的先进内镜成像技术
Visc Med. 2020 Feb;36(1):48-59. doi: 10.1159/000505411. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
10
Advances in endoscopy for colorectal polyp detection and classification.用于大肠息肉检测与分类的内窥镜检查进展
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2019 Dec 18;33(1):28-35. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2019.1686327. eCollection 2020 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Narrow-band imaging does not improve detection of colorectal polyps when compared to conventional colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis of published studies.窄带成像技术与传统结肠镜检查相比,并未提高结直肠息肉的检出率:一项随机对照试验和发表研究的荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2011 Sep 23;11:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-11-100.
2
Randomized, controlled trial of standard-definition white-light, high-definition white-light, and narrow-band imaging colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and prediction of polyp histology.随机对照试验研究标准白光、高清白光和窄带成像结肠镜检查对结肠息肉的检出率和预测息肉组织学的作用。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):593-602. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.050. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
3
Global cancer statistics.全球癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
4
Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, magnifying chromoendoscopy, and magnifying narrow-band imaging systems in the differential diagnosis of small colonic polyps between trainee and experienced endoscopist.实习内镜医师与经验丰富的内镜医师运用传统结肠镜检查、放大色素内镜检查及放大窄带成像系统鉴别诊断小的结肠息肉的对比研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Dec;24(12):1413-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0760-9. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
5
High accuracy of narrow band imaging without magnification for the real-time characterization of polyp histology and its comparison with high-definition white light colonoscopy: a prospective study.无放大窄带成像用于息肉组织学实时特征分析及其与高清白光结肠镜检查比较的高准确性:一项前瞻性研究
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct;104(10):2422-30. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.403. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
6
The impact of narrow band imaging in screening colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.窄带成像技术在结肠镜筛查中的作用:一项随机对照试验
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Oct;7(10):1049-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.028. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
7
Combining autofluorescence imaging and narrow-band imaging for the differentiation of adenomas from non-neoplastic colonic polyps among experienced and non-experienced endoscopists.在有经验和无经验的内镜医师中,联合使用自体荧光成像和窄带成像以鉴别腺瘤与非肿瘤性结肠息肉。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jun;104(6):1498-507. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.161. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
8
Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy.筛查结肠镜检查中息肉检出率的差异。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jun;69(7):1288-95. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.11.043.
9
Chromocolonoscopy detects more adenomas than white light colonoscopy or narrow band imaging colonoscopy in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer screening.在遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌筛查中,染色结肠镜检查比白光结肠镜检查或窄带成像结肠镜检查能检测出更多的腺瘤。
Endoscopy. 2009 Apr;41(4):316-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1119628. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
10
Recognition of surface mucosal and vascular patterns of colon polyps by using narrow-band imaging: interobserver and intraobserver agreement and prediction of polyp histology.利用窄带成像识别结肠息肉的表面黏膜和血管形态:观察者间及观察者内一致性和息肉组织学预测
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):716-22. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.058.

窄带成像与传统白光结肠镜检查在结直肠息肉检测中的应用比较

Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.

作者信息

Nagorni Aleksandar, Bjelakovic Goran, Petrovic Bratislav

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine - Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical Faculty, University of Nis, Nis, Serbia.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD008361. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008361.pub2.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD008361.pub2
PMID:22258983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11801329/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that narrow band imaging colonoscopy (NBI) might be better for detection of colorectal polyps than white light colonoscopy (WLC).

OBJECTIVES

To compare standard or high definition white light colonoscopy with narrow band imaging colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE to August 2011. We scanned bibliographies of relevant publications and wrote to experts for additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two authors (NA and GB) independently applied the inclusion criteria and extracted the data to all potential studies without blinding.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Authors extracted data independently. Trials with adequate randomisation, allocation concealment, and complete outcome data reporting, as well as without selective outcome reporting or other bias were classified as having a lowest risk of bias. Random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses were conducted.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 11 randomised trials comparing WLC with NBI for detection of colorectal polyps. In total eight randomised trials with 3673 participants provided data for our analyses. There was no statistically significant difference between WLC (standard definition and high definition pooled) and NBI for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps (6 trials, n = 2832, RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.04), patients with colorectal adenomas (8 trials, n = 3673, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.02), or patients with colorectal hyperplastic polyps (2 trials, n = 645, RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.00). Number of patients with at least one colorectal adenoma was not significantly different between WLC and NBI group irrespective of adenoma size (< 5 mm:RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.08, I(2) = 56%; 6 to 9 mm: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.39, I(2) = 0%; ≥ 10 mm: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.45, I(2) = 0%). Number of patients with at least one colorectal polyp, or colorectal adenoma was significantly lower in the standard definition WLC group compared to NBI group in fixed-effect meta-analysis (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97, I(2) = 78%; RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.99, I(2) = 0%, respectively), but not significantly different in random-effects meta-analysis (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.10, I(2) = 78%). There was no statistically significant difference between high definition WLC and NBI in the number of patiens with at least one colorectal polyp or colorectal adenoma (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.28; RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.99, I(2) = 0%, respectively).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We could not find convincing evidence that NBI is significantly better than high definition WLC for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps, or colorectal adenomas. We found evidence that NBI might be better than standard definition WLC and equal to high definition WLC for detection the patients with colorectal polyps, or colorectal adenomas.

摘要

背景

有人提出,窄带成像结肠镜检查(NBI)在检测大肠息肉方面可能比白光结肠镜检查(WLC)更好。

目的

比较标准或高清白光结肠镜检查与窄带成像结肠镜检查在检测大肠息肉方面的效果。

检索方法

我们检索了截至2011年8月的Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE和EMBASE。我们查阅了相关出版物的参考文献,并写信给专家询问其他试验。

入选标准

两位作者(NA和GB)独立应用入选标准,对所有潜在研究提取数据,未设盲。

数据收集与分析

作者独立提取数据。具有充分随机化、分配隐藏和完整结局数据报告,且无选择性结局报告或其他偏倚的试验被归类为偏倚风险最低。进行了随机效应和固定效应荟萃分析。

主要结果

我们确定了11项比较WLC和NBI检测大肠息肉的随机试验。共有8项随机试验,3673名参与者为我们的分析提供了数据。在检测大肠息肉患者(6项试验,n = 2832,RR 0.97,95%CI 0.91至1.04)、大肠腺瘤患者(8项试验,n = 3673,RR 0.94,95%CI 0.87至1.02)或大肠增生性息肉患者(2项试验,n = 645,RR 0.87,95%CI 0.76至1.00)方面,WLC(标准清晰度和高清晰度合并)与NBI之间无统计学显著差异。无论腺瘤大小如何(<5mm:RR 0.95,95%CI 0.84至1.08,I² = 56%;6至9mm:RR 1.06,95%CI 0.81至1.39,I² = 0%;≥10mm:RR 1.06,95%CI 0.77至1.45,I² = 0%),WLC组和NBI组中至少有一个大肠腺瘤的患者数量无显著差异。在固定效应荟萃分析中,标准清晰度WLC组中至少有一个大肠息肉或大肠腺瘤的患者数量显著低于NBI组(RR 0.87,95%CI 0.78至0.97,I² = 78%;RR 0.87,95%CI 0.77至0.99,I² = 0%),但在随机效应荟萃分析中无显著差异(RR 0.86,95%CI 0.68至1.10,I² = 78%)。在至少有一个大肠息肉或大肠腺瘤的患者数量方面,高清晰度WLC与NBI之间无统计学显著差异(RR 1.10,95%CI 0.95至1.28;RR 0.87,95%CI 0.77至0.99,I² = 0%)。

作者结论

我们未找到令人信服的证据表明NBI在检测大肠息肉或大肠腺瘤患者方面明显优于高清晰度WLC。我们发现有证据表明,在检测大肠息肉或大肠腺瘤患者方面,NBI可能优于标准清晰度WLC且等同于高清晰度WLC。