Suppr超能文献

舒尼替尼治疗伴有 KIT 突变的黑色素瘤患者。

Sunitinib therapy for melanoma patients with KIT mutations.

机构信息

California Pacific Center for Melanoma Research and Treatment, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Mar 1;18(5):1457-63. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1987. Epub 2012 Jan 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Recent studies have shown activating KIT mutations in melanoma originating from mucosa, acral, or cumulative sun-damaged skin sites. We aimed to assess the predictive role of KIT mutation, amplification, or overexpression for response to treatment with the kinase inhibitor sunitinib.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Tumor tissues from 90 patients with stage III or IV acral, mucosal, or cumulative sun-damaged skin melanoma underwent sequencing of KIT, BRAF, NRAS, and GNAQ genes, FISH analysis for KIT amplification, and immunohistochemistry of KIT protein (CD117). Patients with mutations, amplifications, or overexpression of KIT were treated with sunitinib and responses measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).

RESULTS

Eleven percent of the melanomas tested had mutations in KIT, 23% in BRAF, 14% in NRAS, and none in GNAQ. Of 12 patients treated with sunitinib, 10 were evaluable. Of the 4 evaluable patients with KIT mutations, 1 had a complete remission for 15 months and 2 had partial responses (1- and 7-month duration). In contrast, only 1 of the 6 patients with only KIT amplification or overexpression alone had a partial response. In 1 responder with rectal melanoma who later progressed, the recurring tumor had a previously undetected mutation in NRAS, which was found in addition to the persisting mutation in KIT. Interestingly, among patients with manifest stage IV disease, KIT mutations were associated with a significantly shortened survival time (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Sunitinib may have activity in patients with melanoma and KIT mutations; more study is needed. KIT mutations may represent an adverse prognostic factor in metastatic melanoma.

摘要

目的

最近的研究表明,黑色素瘤起源于黏膜、肢端或累积性日光损伤皮肤的病例中存在激活 KIT 突变。我们旨在评估 KIT 突变、扩增或过表达对激酶抑制剂舒尼替尼治疗反应的预测作用。

实验设计

对 90 例 III 期或 IV 期肢端、黏膜或累积性日光损伤皮肤黑色素瘤患者的肿瘤组织进行 KIT、BRAF、NRAS 和 GNAQ 基因测序、KIT 扩增的 FISH 分析以及 KIT 蛋白(CD117)的免疫组化分析。对 KIT 突变、扩增或过表达的患者进行舒尼替尼治疗,并通过实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)测量反应。

结果

11%的黑色素瘤检测出 KIT 突变,23%的黑色素瘤检测出 BRAF 突变,14%的黑色素瘤检测出 NRAS 突变,没有黑色素瘤检测出 GNAQ 突变。在接受舒尼替尼治疗的 12 名患者中,有 10 名可评估。在 4 名可评估的 KIT 突变患者中,有 1 名患者完全缓解 15 个月,2 名患者部分缓解(缓解持续时间为 1 个月和 7 个月)。相比之下,仅有 1 名 KIT 扩增或过表达的患者出现部分缓解。在 1 名有直肠黑色素瘤病史且后来进展的缓解者中,复发性肿瘤中存在先前未检测到的 NRAS 突变,除了持续存在的 KIT 突变外,还存在该突变。有趣的是,在有明显 IV 期疾病的患者中,KIT 突变与生存时间明显缩短相关(P < 0.0001)。

结论

舒尼替尼可能对 KIT 突变的黑色素瘤患者有效,需要更多的研究。KIT 突变可能是转移性黑色素瘤的不良预后因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验