Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2012 Jun;22(6):1303-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2375-0. Epub 2012 Jan 22.
We investigated whether cardiac computed tomography (CCT) can determine intraventricular dyssynchrony in comparison to real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) in patients who are considered for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT).
35 patients considered for CRT were examined. Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony was quantified by calculating the standard deviation index (SDI) of 17 myocardial LV segments by RT3DE and ECG-gated contrast-enhanced 64-slice dual-source CCT. For both analyses the same software algorithm (4D LV-Analysis) was used.
Close correlations were observed for end-systolic volume, end-diastolic volume and LV ejection fraction between the two techniques (r = 0.94, r = 0.92 and r = 0.95, respectively, P < 0.001 for all). For the global dyssynchrony index SDI, a high correlation was found between RT3DE and CCT (r = 0.84, P < 0.001), which further increased after exclusion of segments with poor image quality by echocardiography (r = 0.90, P < 0.001). The required time for quantitative analysis was significantly shorter (162 ± 22 s vs. 608 ± 112 s per patient, P < 0.001) and reproducibility was significantly higher for CCT compared with RT3DE (interobserver variability of 4.5 ± 3.1% vs. 7.9 ± 6.1%, P < 0.05).
Quantitative assessment of LV dyssynchrony is feasible by CCT. Owing to its higher reproducibility and faster analysis time compared with RT3DE, this technique may represent a valuable alternative for dyssynchrony assessment.
• Quantitative assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony is feasible by cardiac computed tomography (CCT). • This technique has been compared with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE). • Reproducibility is significantly higher for CCT compared with RT3DE. • Time spent for analysis is significantly shorter for CCT. • Computed tomography may represent a valuable alternative to ultrasound for dyssynchrony assessment.
我们研究了心脏计算机断层扫描(CCT)是否可以与实时三维超声心动图(RT3DE)相比,在考虑心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的患者中确定室内不同步。
对 35 名考虑 CRT 的患者进行了检查。通过 RT3DE 和心电图门控对比增强 64 层双源 CCT 计算 17 个心肌左心室节段的标准偏差指数(SDI)来定量评估左心室(LV)不同步。这两种分析都使用相同的软件算法(4D LV-Analysis)。
两种技术之间的收缩末期容积、舒张末期容积和 LV 射血分数均密切相关(r = 0.94、r = 0.92 和 r = 0.95,均 P < 0.001)。对于全局不同步指数 SDI,RT3DE 与 CCT 之间存在高度相关性(r = 0.84,P < 0.001),在排除超声心动图图像质量差的节段后相关性进一步增加(r = 0.90,P < 0.001)。定量分析所需的时间明显更短(每位患者分别为 162 ± 22 秒和 608 ± 112 秒,P < 0.001),与 RT3DE 相比,CCT 的可重复性显著更高(观察者间变异性为 4.5 ± 3.1%与 7.9 ± 6.1%,P < 0.05)。
CCT 可实现 LV 不同步的定量评估。由于 CCT 与 RT3DE 相比具有更高的可重复性和更快的分析时间,因此该技术可能是评估不同步的有价值的替代方法。
• CCT 可实现左心室不同步的定量评估。• 已将该技术与实时三维超声心动图(RT3DE)进行比较。• CCT 的可重复性明显高于 RT3DE。• 分析时间明显更短 CCT。• 与超声心动图相比,计算机断层扫描可能是评估不同步的有价值的替代方法。