Götte D
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2012 Feb;137(6):274-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1298842. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
2011 on drug development are discussed. Assessment criteria for an evaluation of the cost/benefit relationship and on incremental clinical benefit as required by the law were retrospectively applied to those drugs which were approved by the EMA in 2009. On average drugs in comparator arms in development studies were cost effective. In most cases placebo was used as a comparator. Recent examples from the cardiovascular and the oral anti-diabetes areas revealed that the G-BA might go beyond EMA requirements; as a consequence two patent-protected products were withdrawn from the German market following G-BA assessment. Recommendations for future drug development strategies are provided.
讨论了2011年药物研发情况。法律要求的成本效益关系评估标准以及增量临床效益评估标准被追溯应用于2009年欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准的那些药物。在研发研究中,对照臂中的药物平均具有成本效益。在大多数情况下,使用安慰剂作为对照。心血管和口服抗糖尿病领域的近期实例表明,德国联邦联合委员会(G-BA)可能超出了EMA的要求;因此,两款受专利保护的产品在G-BA评估后被撤出德国市场。文中还提供了未来药物研发策略的建议。