Suppr超能文献

基于终生暴露模型对膳食摄入赭曲霉毒素 A 相关风险的重新评估。

A reassessment of risk associated with dietary intake of ochratoxin A based on a lifetime exposure model.

机构信息

Cantox Health Sciences International, An Intertek Company, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2012 Feb;42(2):147-68. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2011.636342.

Abstract

Mycotoxins, such as ochratoxin A (OTA), can occur from fungal growth on foods. OTA is considered a possible risk factor for adverse renal effects in humans based on renal tumors in male rats. For risk mitigation, Health Canada proposed maximum limits (MLs) for OTA based largely on a comparative risk assessment conducted by Health Canada (Kuiper-Goodman et al., 2010), in which analytical data of OTA in foods were used to determine the possible impact adopting MLs may have on OTA risks. The EU MLs were used for comparison and resultant risk was determined based on age-sex strata groups. These data were reevaluated here to determine comparative risk on a lifetime basis instead of age strata. Also, as there is scientific disagreement over the mechanism of OTA-induced renal tumors, mechanistic data were revisited. On a lifetime basis, risks associated with dietary exposure were found to be negligible, even without MLs, with dietary exposures to OTA three to four orders of magnitude below the pivotal animal LOAEL and the TD(05). Our review of the mechanistic data supported a threshold-based mechanism as the most plausible. In particular, OTA was negative in genotoxicity assays with the highest specificity and levels of DNA adducts were very low and not typical of genotoxic carcinogens. In conclusion, OTA exposures from Canadian foods do not present a significant cancer risk.

摘要

真菌毒素,如赭曲霉毒素 A(OTA),可能会在食物上的真菌生长时产生。基于雄性大鼠的肾脏肿瘤,OTA 被认为是人类肾脏不良影响的一个潜在危险因素。为了降低风险,加拿大卫生部根据加拿大卫生部(Kuiper-Goodman 等人,2010 年)进行的比较风险评估,提出了 OTA 的最大限量(ML),其中使用了食品中 OTA 的分析数据来确定采用 ML 可能对 OTA 风险产生的影响。欧盟的 ML 被用于比较,根据年龄-性别分层组确定了由此产生的风险。在这里,我们重新评估了这些数据,以确定终生基础上的比较风险,而不是年龄分层。此外,由于关于 OTA 诱导的肾脏肿瘤的机制存在科学分歧,我们重新审查了机制数据。从终生基础上看,即使没有 ML,与饮食暴露相关的风险也可以忽略不计,因为饮食中 OTA 的暴露量比关键动物 LOAEL 和 TD(05)低三到四个数量级。我们对机制数据的审查支持基于阈值的机制是最合理的。特别是,OTA 在遗传毒性检测中呈阴性,特异性最高,并且 DNA 加合物的水平非常低,与遗传毒性致癌剂不同。总之,加拿大食品中的 OTA 暴露不会带来显著的癌症风险。

相似文献

5
Health risk assessment of ochratoxin A for all age-sex strata in a market economy.市场经济条件下各年龄段、性别人群赭曲霉毒素 A 的健康风险评估
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2010 Feb;27(2):212-40. doi: 10.1080/02652030903013278.
7
A risk assessment of dietary Ochratoxin a in the United States.美国膳食中赭曲霉毒素A的风险评估。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2017 Feb;100:265-273. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2016.12.037. Epub 2016 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

8
A risk assessment of dietary Ochratoxin a in the United States.美国膳食中赭曲霉毒素A的风险评估。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2017 Feb;100:265-273. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2016.12.037. Epub 2016 Dec 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Aristolochic acids.马兜铃酸
Rep Carcinog. 2011;12:45-9.
3
Surveys of rice sold in Canada for aflatoxins, ochratoxin A and fumonisins.对加拿大销售的大米中的黄曲霉毒素、赭曲霉毒素 A 和伏马菌素进行调查。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2011 Jun;28(6):767-74. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2011.559279.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验