Suppr超能文献

化学强化淋洗修复铜/菲复合污染黄土

[Remediation of Cu/phenanthrene and combined contaminated loess soil by chemical-enhanced washing].

作者信息

Zhong Jin-Kui, Zhao Bao-Wei, Zhu Kun, Ma Feng-Feng, Yang Xing-Chun, Ran Jing-Yuan

机构信息

School of Environmental & Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China.

出版信息

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2011 Oct;32(10):3106-12.

Abstract

The chemical-enhanced washing of Cu2+ or/and phenanthrene (PHE) single or combined contaminated loess soil in Gansu Province was investigated with disodium ethylene diamine tetraacetate (EDTA) or/and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) by the batch equilibrium experiments. The experimental results showed that EDTA or/and SDS could remove efficiently Cu2+ and/or PHE in single-contaminated or combined contaminated loess soils. The Cu2+ removal was significantly promoted by coexisting PHE with low concentration of EDTA (EDTA < 0.1 mol/L), however, the removal was slightly hindered with high concentration of EDTA (EDTA > 0.1 mol/L). As for the PHE removal by EDTA, it was founded that coexisting Cu2+ could enhance the PHE removal in the investigated ranges of the concentrations of EDTA. When concentration of EDTA was 0.01 mol/L, the removal of combined PHE was 20.94% higher than that of single PHE. The experimental results of the removal of contaminations by SDS showed that coexisting Cu2+ could suppress slightly the removal of PHE at a concentration of less than 4 000 mg/L SDS, but could assist the removal of PHE in 5 000 mg/L or higher SDS concentration. On the contrary, the influence of coexisting PHE for the removal of Cu2+ by SDS was that it facilitated Cu2+ extraction by low concentrations of SDS, however, it inhibited the removal of Cu2+ at high concentrations of SDS. The removal efficiencies of PHE and Cu2+ were improved greatly as using combined EDTA-SDS. Beside, there are some differences in the removal efficiency of the oth contaminants with the different sequence of EDTA and SDS added in the washing solution. In EDTA washing followed by SDS, SDS washing followed by EDTA and mixture of SDS-EDTA washing concurrently, the removal of Cu2+ is 91.40%, 95.10% and 96.50%, respectively, which is 28.46%, 32.16%, 33.56% higher than that of combined, 62.94%, by single EDTA. For PHE, the removal is 68.30%, 85.40%, 84.95%, respectively, which is 16.14%, 33.24%, 32. 79% higher than that of combined PHE, 52.16%, by single SDS. Thus, SDS washing followed by EDTA or mixture of SDS-EDTA washing concurrently is considered as the optimal washing sequence for PHE and Cu2+ removal.

摘要

通过批量平衡实验,采用乙二胺四乙酸二钠(EDTA)或/和十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)对甘肃省铜离子(Cu2+)或/和菲(PHE)单一或复合污染的黄土进行化学强化洗涤研究。实验结果表明,EDTA或/和SDS能够有效去除单一污染或复合污染黄土中的Cu2+和/或PHE。低浓度EDTA(EDTA<0.1mol/L)共存时,PHE的存在显著促进了Cu2+的去除;然而,高浓度EDTA(EDTA>0.1mol/L)时,去除略有受阻。对于EDTA去除PHE,发现在所研究的EDTA浓度范围内,共存的Cu2+能够提高PHE的去除率。当EDTA浓度为0.01mol/L时,复合PHE的去除率比单一PHE高20.94%。SDS去除污染物的实验结果表明,在SDS浓度小于4000mg/L时,共存的Cu2+会略微抑制PHE的去除,但在SDS浓度为5000mg/L及以上时,会促进PHE的去除。相反,共存的PHE对SDS去除Cu2+的影响是,低浓度SDS时促进Cu2+的提取,而高浓度SDS时抑制Cu2+的去除。使用EDTA-SDS组合时,PHE和Cu2+的去除效率大大提高。此外,洗涤液中添加EDTA和SDS的顺序不同,对其他污染物的去除效率也存在一些差异。先EDTA洗涤后SDS洗涤、先SDS洗涤后EDTA洗涤以及SDS-EDTA混合同时洗涤,Cu2+的去除率分别为91.40%、95.10%和96.50%,分别比单一EDTA组合的62.94%高28.46%、32.16%、33.56%。对于PHE而言,去除率分别为68.30%、85.40%、84.95%,分别比单一SDS组合的52.16%高16.14%、33.24%、32.79%。因此,先SDS洗涤后EDTA洗涤或SDS-EDTA混合同时洗涤被认为是去除PHE和Cu2+的最佳洗涤顺序。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验