Department Bioanalytical Ecotoxicology, UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoser Street 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Mar 6;46(5):2508-22. doi: 10.1021/es2038036. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
The advent of new genomic techniques has raised expectations that central questions of mixture toxicology such as for mechanisms of low dose interactions can now be answered. This review provides an overview on experimental studies from the past decade that address diagnostic and/or mechanistic questions regarding the combined effects of chemical mixtures using toxicogenomic techniques. From 2002 to 2011, 41 studies were published with a focus on mixture toxicity assessment. Primarily multiplexed quantification of gene transcripts was performed, though metabolomic and proteomic analysis of joint exposures have also been undertaken. It is now standard to explicitly state criteria for selecting concentrations and provide insight into data transformation and statistical treatment with respect to minimizing sources of undue variability. Bioinformatic analysis of toxicogenomic data, by contrast, is still a field with diverse and rapidly evolving tools. The reported combined effect assessments are discussed in the light of established toxicological dose-response and mixture toxicity models. Receptor-based assays seem to be the most advanced toward establishing quantitative relationships between exposure and biological responses. Often transcriptomic responses are discussed based on the presence or absence of signals, where the interpretation may remain ambiguous due to methodological problems. The majority of mixture studies design their studies to compare the recorded mixture outcome against responses for individual components only. This stands in stark contrast to our existing understanding of joint biological activity at the levels of chemical target interactions and apical combined effects. By joining established mixture effect models with toxicokinetic and -dynamic thinking, we suggest a conceptual framework that may help to overcome the current limitation of providing mainly anecdotal evidence on mixture effects. To achieve this we suggest (i) to design studies to establish quantitative relationships between dose and time dependency of responses and (ii) to adopt mixture toxicity models. Moreover, (iii) utilization of novel bioinformatic tools and (iv) stress response concepts could be productive to translate multiple responses into hypotheses on the relationships between general stress and specific toxicity reactions of organisms.
新基因组技术的出现使得人们期望能够回答混合毒理学的核心问题,例如低剂量相互作用的机制。本综述概述了过去十年中使用毒理基因组学技术解决有关化学混合物联合效应的诊断和/或机制问题的实验研究。2002 年至 2011 年,发表了 41 项侧重于混合物毒性评估的研究。主要进行了基因转录物的多重定量分析,尽管也进行了联合暴露的代谢组学和蛋白质组学分析。现在的标准是明确选择浓度的标准,并深入了解数据转换和统计处理,以最小化不必要的变异性源。相比之下,毒理基因组学数据的生物信息学分析仍然是一个具有多样化和快速发展工具的领域。根据既定的毒理学剂量-反应和混合物毒性模型讨论报告的联合效应评估。基于受体的测定似乎是建立暴露与生物反应之间定量关系最先进的方法。转录组反应通常根据信号的存在与否进行讨论,由于方法学问题,解释可能仍然模棱两可。大多数混合物研究设计其研究是为了将记录的混合物结果与单个成分的反应进行比较。这与我们现有的对化学靶标相互作用和顶端联合效应水平的联合生物活性的理解形成鲜明对比。通过将既定的混合物效应模型与毒代动力学和毒动学思维相结合,我们提出了一个概念框架,可能有助于克服提供关于混合物效应的主要轶事证据的当前局限性。为此,我们建议(i)设计研究以建立剂量和时间依赖性响应之间的定量关系,(ii)采用混合物毒性模型。此外,(iii)利用新型生物信息学工具和(iv)应激反应概念可以将多种反应转化为关于一般应激与生物体特定毒性反应之间关系的假设。