Suppr超能文献

在日本进行的一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 II 期研究中,评估了在接受下颌第三磨牙阻生牙拔除术后的成年患者中,额外给予 200mg 塞来昔布的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and safety of additional 200-mg dose of celecoxib in adult patients with postoperative pain following extraction of impacted third mandibular molar: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2012 Feb;34(2):314-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.01.004. Epub 2012 Jan 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although third mandibular molar extraction is a widely used and validated model of acute pain for evaluating analgesic efficacy, a large proportion of patients experience moderate or severe pain following this procedure and require analgesia. Current treatment options have been associated with safety concerns and alternative therapies are sought.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of an additional 200-mg dose of celecoxib, administered 5 to 12 hours after an initial 400-mg dose of the drug for the treatment of moderate or severe acute pain following extraction of an impacted third mandibular molar.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase II study. Patients experiencing moderate or severe pain within 1 to 2 hours following extraction of an impacted third mandibular molar received an initial 400-mg dose of celecoxib. Patients requiring additional analgesia were subsequently randomized to receive either an additional 200-mg dose of celecoxib or placebo 5 to 12 hours after the initial dose. The study was designed and conducted by Pfizer Inc. for approval of celecoxib in Japan for the indication of acute pain. The primary end point was the patient's impression of efficacy (4-category global evaluation scale). Secondary efficacy end points included pain intensity on a 4-category pain intensity scale, pain intensity on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), and the pain intensity difference (100-mm VAS). In an exploratory analysis, use of rescue medication was evaluated. Primary and secondary end points were analyzed using the full analysis set. Assessment of the safety profile included a physical examination, measurement of pulse rate and blood pressure, standard 12-lead ECG, and laboratory tests.

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients (celecoxib, 42/64 [65.6%]; placebo, 27/58 [46.6%]) received the additional dose of study medication; all completed the study without the need for rescue medication. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the celecoxib 200 mg group (41/64 [64.1%]) compared with the placebo group (15/58 [25.9%]) rated the study medication as "good" or "excellent" ≥ 2 hours after the additional dose (P < 0.0001). Pain intensity (VAS) 2 hours after the additional dose was significantly higher in the placebo group than in the celecoxib 200 mg group (P = 0.0003). The reduction in pain intensity from baseline to 2 hours after the additional dose of study medication was also significantly greater in the celecoxib 200 mg group than in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). The incidence of treatment-related, all-cause adverse events was slightly lower in patients receiving celecoxib 200 mg (20.3%) compared with placebo (31.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, an additional 200-mg dose of celecoxib was well tolerated and efficacious in reducing the pain associated with extraction of an impacted third mandibular molar in the study population. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01062113.

摘要

背景

尽管第三磨牙拔除是评估镇痛疗效的一种广泛应用和验证的急性疼痛模型,但很大一部分患者在接受该手术后会经历中度或重度疼痛,并需要镇痛。目前的治疗选择存在安全性问题,因此正在寻找替代疗法。

目的

我们旨在评估在初次给予 400 毫克塞来昔布后 5 至 12 小时给予 200 毫克额外剂量塞来昔布治疗拔除阻生第三磨牙后中度或重度急性疼痛的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、II 期研究。在拔除阻生第三磨牙后 1 至 2 小时内出现中度或重度疼痛的患者接受初次给予 400 毫克塞来昔布。需要额外镇痛的患者随后随机接受 200 毫克塞来昔布或安慰剂,在初次剂量后 5 至 12 小时给予。该研究由辉瑞公司设计和进行,旨在为塞来昔布在日本获批用于治疗急性疼痛提供支持。主要终点是患者对疗效的印象(4 级总体评估量表)。次要疗效终点包括 4 级疼痛强度量表上的疼痛强度、100 毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)上的疼痛强度和疼痛强度差异(100 毫米 VAS)。在探索性分析中,评估了使用解救药物的情况。主要和次要终点均采用全分析集进行分析。安全性评估包括体格检查、脉搏和血压测量、标准 12 导联心电图和实验室检查。

结果

共有 69 名患者(塞来昔布 42/64 [65.6%];安慰剂 27/58 [46.6%])接受了研究药物的额外剂量;所有患者均完成了研究,无需使用解救药物。与安慰剂组(15/58 [25.9%])相比,接受塞来昔布 200 毫克组(41/64 [64.1%])有更高比例的患者在接受额外剂量后 2 小时内将研究药物评为“好”或“优”(P<0.0001)。与塞来昔布 200 毫克组相比,安慰剂组在接受额外剂量后 2 小时的疼痛强度(VAS)显著更高(P=0.0003)。与安慰剂组相比,接受塞来昔布 200 毫克组的患者在接受研究药物额外剂量后 2 小时内疼痛强度的降低也显著更大(P<0.0001)。接受塞来昔布 200 毫克治疗的患者治疗相关不良事件的总发生率(20.3%)略低于安慰剂组(31.0%)。

结论

总体而言,在研究人群中,额外给予 200 毫克塞来昔布可良好耐受,并能有效减轻拔除阻生第三磨牙引起的疼痛。临床试验注册号:NCT01062113。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验