Wolffing B K
Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Fairlane Center, Dearborn, MI 48126.
Henry Ford Hosp Med J. 1990;38(1):57-61.
PaperChase, a self-service computerized literature search (SSCLS) service, was compared to conventional resources for accessing recent medical information by assessing user attitudes, search costs, and number of searches performed. The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial using survey instruments before and after the intervention. Accounting of PaperChase searches was monitored electronically, and costs of librarian searches were provided by the hospital library. Participants included 57 physicians in several specialties who were members of a group practice located in a suburban ambulatory care center. Responses were received from 67%. The experimental group received free, unlimited access to PaperChase over a one-year period, while the control group used conventional resources (manually self-performed searches and computerized MEDLINE searches performed free-of-charge by hospital librarians). The study disclosed no change in attitude of either those employing computers or SSCLS. Attitude scores in the experimental group showed statistically significant worsening in preference for SSCLS over textbook use and the estimation of SSCLS utility in the outpatient setting. The cost of PaperChase compared favorably to literature searches done by librarians. The self-reported numbers of literature searches of all types increased in the experimental group. PaperChase searches changed physicians' perceptions of patient treatment and outcome in some cases. While computerized literature searches may have a role in the outpatient setting, other resources remain important. Although only certain physicians are interested in using this method, this study shows that PaperChase can be a cost-effective alternative to MEDLINE searches performed by hospital librarians.
通过评估用户态度、搜索成本和搜索次数,将自助式计算机文献检索服务(PaperChase)与获取近期医学信息的传统资源进行了比较。该研究设计为一项随机对照试验,在干预前后使用调查工具。通过电子方式监测PaperChase搜索的记录,医院图书馆提供图书馆员搜索的成本。参与者包括位于郊区门诊护理中心的一家团体诊所的57名不同专科的医生。收到了67%的回复。实验组在一年时间内可免费无限制使用PaperChase,而对照组使用传统资源(手动自行搜索以及由医院图书馆员免费进行的计算机化医学文献数据库搜索)。研究表明,使用计算机或自助式计算机文献检索服务的人的态度均未改变。实验组的态度得分显示,与使用教科书相比,对自助式计算机文献检索服务的偏好以及在门诊环境中对其效用的估计在统计学上有显著恶化。PaperChase的成本与图书馆员进行的文献检索相比具有优势。实验组中所有类型文献检索的自我报告次数有所增加。在某些情况下,PaperChase搜索改变了医生对患者治疗和结果的看法。虽然计算机化文献检索在门诊环境中可能有作用,但其他资源仍然很重要。尽管只有某些医生对使用这种方法感兴趣,但这项研究表明,PaperChase可以成为医院图书馆员进行医学文献数据库搜索的一种具有成本效益的替代方法。