• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

犬牙槽窝与经鼻上颌窦入路的尸体比较。

Cadaveric comparison of canine fossa vs transnasal maxillary sinus access.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Lackland AFB, TX, USA.

出版信息

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011 May-Jun;1(3):183-6. doi: 10.1002/alr.20022. Epub 2011 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1002/alr.20022
PMID:22287370
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Anatomic limitations complicate complete eradication of debris from the maxillary sinus using an exclusively transnasal (TN) endoscopic technique. Creation of a canine fossa trephination (CFT) permits a more direct approach than removal via the maxillary ostium.

METHODS

Microdebrider eradication of debris completely filling the maxillary sinus was performed on 5 thawed fresh-frozen cadaver heads (10 sides) using a TN or CFT approach. Postdebridement computed tomography (CT) scanning assessed remaining debris. Additional outcome measures included time of debris removal, number of different angled blades utilized, and clogging.

RESULTS

A significantly greater amount of debris was left after the TN approach compared with CFT (3.88 cm(3) vs 2.88 cm(3), p = 0.015). Median blade utilization was significantly higher with the TN approach vs CFT (4 vs 1, p < 0.002). Time for debris eradication with CFT was similar regardless of expertise (323.4 vs 272.4 seconds, p = 0.21), but the TN approach showed a statistical difference in time-to-completion (698.8 vs 438.51 seconds, p = 1.7 × 10(-5)).

CONCLUSION

Controversy surrounds the appropriate application of CFT due to disease process and approach-related morbidity. Rhinologists should have numerous well-studied options at their disposal. This model suggests that maxillary debris removal is accomplished more thoroughly with fewer microdebrider blades when a CFT approach is employed.

摘要

目的

解剖学局限性使通过单纯经鼻(TN)内镜技术彻底清除上颌窦内的碎片变得复杂。创建犬齿窝磨钻术(CFT)可提供比经上颌窦口去除更直接的方法。

方法

使用 TN 或 CFT 方法对上颌窦完全充满碎片的 5 个解冻新鲜冷冻尸体头颅(10 侧)进行微钻清创术。清创后行计算机断层扫描(CT)评估残留碎片。其他结果指标包括碎片清除时间、使用的不同角度刀片数量和堵塞。

结果

与 CFT 相比,TN 方法后留下的碎片量明显更多(3.88 cm3 比 2.88 cm3,p = 0.015)。与 CFT 相比,TN 方法的刀片使用中位数明显更高(4 比 1,p < 0.002)。无论经验如何,CFT 清除碎片的时间都相似(323.4 秒比 272.4 秒,p = 0.21),但 TN 方法在完成时间上存在统计学差异(698.8 秒比 438.51 秒,p = 1.7×10(-5))。

结论

由于疾病过程和与方法相关的发病率,CFT 的适当应用存在争议。鼻科医生应该有许多经过充分研究的选择。该模型表明,当使用 CFT 方法时,使用更少的微钻可更彻底地清除上颌窦碎片。