Suppr超能文献

重度创伤性脑损伤患者格拉斯哥预后评分的预后预测因素

Outcome predictors of Glasgow Outcome Scale score in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Klemenc-Ketis Zalika, Bacovnik-Jansa Urska, Ogorevc Marko, Kersnik Janko

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Medical School, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2011 Nov;17(6):509-15. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2011.35336.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury is a major public health problem due to high mortality and morbidity among survivors.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. We recorded the attending physician's evaluation of the patient's consciousness, the patient's demographics, routine physical measurements, and medical interventions. We used Glasgow Coma Scale and Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale.

RESULTS

We included 60 patients (83.3% males, mean age: 49.5 years). The Glasgow Coma Scale score was 4.8±1.9 and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale score was 2.9±2.5 points. Linear regression for higher Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale score explained 59.8% of the variance and revealed the duration of hospital stay and the presence of epidural hematoma as significant predictors. The classification tree for the higher Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale score revealed the following variables to be important: the duration of hospital stay, Glasgow Coma Scale score, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, surgery, response time of out-of-hospital emergency team, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fall, and basis fracture.

CONCLUSION

Standardized inpatient protocol on monitoring, intervention and outcome recording should be adopted to make future comparisons more useful and to promote benchmarking between trauma centers in order to improve care for patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

摘要

背景

由于创伤性脑损伤幸存者的高死亡率和高发病率,它成为一个主要的公共卫生问题。

方法

我们对重度创伤性脑损伤患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们记录了主治医生对患者意识的评估、患者的人口统计学信息、常规身体测量数据以及医疗干预措施。我们使用了格拉斯哥昏迷量表和扩展格拉斯哥预后量表。

结果

我们纳入了60例患者(男性占83.3%,平均年龄:49.5岁)。格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为4.8±1.9,扩展格拉斯哥预后量表评分为2.9±2.5分。较高扩展格拉斯哥预后量表评分的线性回归解释了59.8%的方差,并显示住院时间和硬膜外血肿的存在是显著的预测因素。较高扩展格拉斯哥预后量表评分的分类树显示以下变量很重要:住院时间、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、二氧化碳分压、手术、院外急救团队的反应时间、收缩压和舒张压、跌倒以及基底骨折。

结论

应采用关于监测、干预和结果记录的标准化住院方案,以便未来的比较更有价值,并促进创伤中心之间的基准比较,从而改善对重度创伤性脑损伤患者的护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验