Neonatal Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012 Aug;47(8):749-56. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21607. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
High-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) is often used to treat infants with pathologies associated with gas trapping and abnormal lung mechanics, who are sensitive to the adverse effects of suction.
This study aimed to investigate the effect of closed suction (CS), catheter size, and the use of active post-suction sighs on tracheal pressure (P(trach)), and global and regional end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) during HFJV.
Six anaesthetized and muscle-relaxed adult rabbits were stabilized on HFJV. CS was performed using all permutations of three CS methods (Continual negative pressure, negative pressure applied during Withdrawal, and HFJV in Standby) and 6 French gauge (6 FG) and 8 French gauge (8 FG) catheter, randomly assigned. The sequence was repeated using post-suction sighs. P(trach), absolute (respiratory inductive plethysmography) and regional (electrical impedance tomography; expressed as percentage of vital capacity for the defined region of interest, %Z(VCroi) ) EELV were measured before, during and 60 sec post-suction.
CS methods exerted no difference on ΔP(trach), ΔEELV(RIP), or Δ%Z(VCroi) . 8FG catheter resulted in a mean (95%CI) 20.0 (17.9,22.2) cm H(2)O greater loss of P(trach) during suction compared to 6FG (Bonferroni post-test). Mean (± SD) ΔEELV(RIP) was -6(±3) and -2(±1) ml/kg with the 8 and 6 FG catheters (P < 0.0001; Bonferroni post-test). ΔEELV was 31.7 (21.1,42.4) %Z(VCroi) and 24.8 (10.9,38.7) %Z(VCroi) greater in the ventral and dorsal hemithoraces using the 8 FG. Only after 8 FG CS was post-suction recruitment required to restore EELV.
In this animal model receiving HFJV, ΔP(trach), ΔEELV, and need for post-suction recruitment during CS were most influenced by catheter size. Volume changes within the lung were uniform.
高频喷射通气(HFJV)常用于治疗与气体潴留和肺力学异常相关的病理状态,且对气道吸引的不良反应较为敏感的患儿。
本研究旨在探讨在高频喷射通气时,密闭式吸引(CS)、导管大小以及使用主动吸引后叹气对气管压力(P(trach))、整体和区域性呼气末肺容量(EELV)的影响。
六只麻醉且肌松的成年兔在高频喷射通气下稳定后,采用三种 CS 方法(持续负压、吸引时负压、备用状态下的高频喷射通气)和 6 号(6FG)和 8 号(8FG)导管进行 CS ,并随机分配。在使用吸引后叹气后,重复该顺序。在吸引前、吸引中和吸引后 60 秒测量 P(trach)、绝对(呼吸感应容积描记法)和区域性(电阻抗断层成像;以指定感兴趣区域的肺活量百分比表示,%Z(VCroi))EELV。
CS 方法对 ΔP(trach)、ΔEELV(RIP)或 Δ%Z(VCroi)没有差异。与 6FG 相比,8FG 导管在吸引时导致平均(95%CI)20.0(17.9,22.2)cm H2O 的 P(trach)丢失增加(Bonferroni 后测)。8FG 和 6FG 导管的平均(±SD)ΔEELV(RIP)分别为-6(±3)和-2(±1)ml/kg(P < 0.0001;Bonferroni 后测)。使用 8FG 时,腹侧和背侧半胸的 ΔEELV 分别为 31.7(21.1,42.4)%Z(VCroi)和 24.8(10.9,38.7)%Z(VCroi),差异有统计学意义。只有在 8FG CS 后,才需要吸引后叹气来恢复 EELV。
在本接受高频喷射通气的动物模型中,CS 期间的 ΔP(trach)、ΔEELV 和吸引后叹气的需求受导管大小的影响最大。肺内的容量变化是均匀的。