School of Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Gerodontology. 2012 Jun;29(2):e1113-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00632.x. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
The aim of this study was to evaluate a screening test based on a food intake questionnaire to discriminate the masticatory ability of Taiwanese older adults with 20 and more natural teeth and at least 8 functional tooth units (FTUs) from the masticatory ability of those with fewer than 20 natural teeth and 8 FTUs.
The subjects were 2244 patients (mean age, 60.4±10.0 years) recruited from 23 counties and cities in Taiwan. Information about their demographic data, dentition, and masticatory ability was collected. Masticatory ability was measured for 23 food groups comprising 35 common Taiwanese foods, and receiver operation characteristic curve analysis was performed.
The results showed that the final questionnaire included 14 food groups and a subject choosing 'difficult to eat' responses for 4 and more of these food groups had the same masticatory ability as individuals with fewer than 20 natural teeth and 8 FTUs.
In conclusion, foods that are the most difficult to eat are not necessarily good discriminatory indicators. Hence, the 14-food group questionnaire can be considered the best screening test for masticatory ability of Taiwanese older adults in terms of the presence of 20 and more natural teeth and at least 8 FTUs.
本研究旨在评估一种基于饮食摄入量问卷的筛选测试,以区分台湾 20 颗及以上天然牙和至少 8 个功能单位(FTU)的老年人与少于 20 颗天然牙和 8 个 FTU 的老年人的咀嚼能力。
共招募了来自台湾 23 个县/市的 2244 名患者(平均年龄 60.4±10.0 岁)。收集了他们的人口统计学数据、牙齿状况和咀嚼能力信息。对包括 35 种常见台湾食物在内的 23 组食物进行咀嚼能力测量,并进行了受试者工作特征曲线分析。
结果表明,最终问卷包括 14 种食物组,选择“难以咀嚼”的个体对 4 种或以上这些食物组的咀嚼能力与少于 20 颗天然牙和 8 个 FTU 的个体相同。
总之,最难咀嚼的食物不一定是很好的区分指标。因此,对于 20 颗及以上天然牙和至少 8 个 FTU 的台湾老年人的咀嚼能力而言,14 种食物组问卷可以被认为是最佳的筛选测试。