Department of Urology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Eur Urol. 2012 May;61(5):917-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.013. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
Tadalafil improved lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; LUTS/BPH) in clinical studies but has not been evaluated together with an active control in an international clinical study.
Assess tadalafil or tamsulosin versus placebo for LUTS/BPH.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomised, double-blind, international, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study assessed men ≥45 yr of age with LUTS/BPH, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥13, and maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)) ≥4 to ≤15ml/s. Following screening and washout, if needed, subjects completed a 4-wk placebo run-in before randomisation to placebo (n=172), tadalafil 5mg (n=171), or tamsulosin 0.4mg (n=168) once daily for 12 wk.
Outcomes were assessed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) or ranked analysis of variance (ANOVA) (continuous variables) and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test or Fisher exact test (categorical variables).
IPSS significantly improved versus placebo through 12 wk with tadalafil (-2.1; p=0.001; primary efficacy outcome) and tamsulosin (-1.5; p=0.023) and as early as 1 wk (tadalafil and tamsulosin both -1.5; p<0.01). BPH Impact Index significantly improved versus placebo at first assessment (week 4) with tadalafil (-0.8; p<0.001) and tamsulosin (-0.9; p<0.001) and through 12 wk (tadalafil -0.8, p=0.003; tamsulosin -0.6, p=0.026). The IPSS Quality-of-Life Index and the Treatment Satisfaction Scale-BPH improved significantly versus placebo with tadalafil (both p<0.05) but not with tamsulosin (both p>0.1). The International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain improved versus placebo with tadalafil (4.0; p<0.001) but not tamsulosin (-0.4; p=0.699). Q(max) increased significantly versus placebo with both tadalafil (2.4ml/s; p=0.009) and tamsulosin (2.2ml/s; p=0.014). Adverse event profiles were consistent with previous reports. This study was limited in not being powered to directly compare tadalafil versus tamsulosin.
Monotherapy with tadalafil or tamsulosin resulted in significant and numerically similar improvements versus placebo in LUTS/BPH and Q(max). However, only tadalafil improved erectile dysfunction.
Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT00970632.
他达拉非在临床研究中改善了下尿路症状(LUTS),提示良性前列腺增生(BPH;LUTS/BPH),但尚未在国际临床研究中与活性对照药物进行评估。
评估他达拉非或坦索罗辛与安慰剂治疗 LUTS/BPH 的效果。
设计、地点和参与者:一项随机、双盲、国际、安慰剂对照、平行组研究纳入了年龄≥45 岁、LUTS/BPH 国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)≥13 分和最大尿流率(Qmax)≥4 至≤15ml/s 的患者。在筛选和洗脱(如有必要)后,患者完成了 4 周的安慰剂导入期,然后随机分配至安慰剂(n=172)、他达拉非 5mg(n=171)或坦索罗辛 0.4mg(n=168),每日一次,治疗 12 周。
使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)或秩方差分析(ANOVA)(连续变量)以及 Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel 检验或 Fisher 确切检验(分类变量)评估结局。
与安慰剂相比,他达拉非(-2.1;p=0.001;主要疗效终点)和坦索罗辛(-1.5;p=0.023)在 12 周内显著改善了 IPSS,并且在 1 周时就出现了改善(他达拉非和坦索罗辛均为-1.5;p<0.01)。与安慰剂相比,他达拉非(-0.8;p<0.001)和坦索罗辛(-0.9;p<0.001)在首次评估(第 4 周)和 12 周时,BPH 影响指数均显著改善,而坦索罗辛则没有(均 p>0.1)。他达拉非显著改善了 IPSS 生活质量指数(p<0.05)和治疗满意度量表-BPH(p<0.05),但坦索罗辛则没有(均 p>0.1)。与安慰剂相比,国际勃起功能指数-勃起功能域(4.0;p<0.001)的改善仅见于他达拉非组,而坦索罗辛组则没有(-0.4;p=0.699)。与安慰剂相比,他达拉非(2.4ml/s;p=0.009)和坦索罗辛(2.2ml/s;p=0.014)均显著增加了 Qmax。
不良事件谱与之前的报告一致。本研究的局限性在于没有足够的效力来直接比较他达拉非与坦索罗辛。
他达拉非或坦索罗辛单药治疗可显著改善 LUTS/BPH 和 Qmax,与安慰剂相比具有数值相似的改善。然而,只有他达拉非改善了勃起功能障碍。
ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号 NCT00970632。