Department of Physics, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 2C6, Canada.
Med Phys. 2012 Feb;39(2):1069-78. doi: 10.1118/1.3679338.
For certain clinical applications, rotational intensity modulated radiation therapy (R-IMRT) techniques such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) are capable of improved target dose coverage and shorter delivery time when compared to static, step-and-shoot IMRT. The authors performed a risk comparison study for two standard step-and-shoot IMRT plans and two step-and-shoot Rotational IMRT plans that were designed specifically for a Siemens Primus linear accelerator.
CT images of a RANDO phantom were used to generate R-IMRT and static IMRT plans. One simple and one complex prostate cases were created to investigate these techniques. The R-IMRT plans consisted of 72 single-segmented 6 MV beams, equally spaced with beam angle separations of 5°. The static IMRT plans employed seven multisegmented 6 MV beams. Both types of plans were optimized in Pinnacle(3) with the direct machine parameter optimization (DMPO) algorithm using the same set of optimization objectives. The plans were delivered to a RANDO phantom and thermoluminescent diode (TLD) dose measurements were performed at various locations throughout the phantom. Risk coefficients and organ weightings as defined by International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 103 were used to calculate the resulting effective doses to various organs at risk, as well as the overall risk estimate for both techniques.
For the simple prostate case, the R-IMRT technique provided a higher dose to organs at risk within the CT volume and a lower overall peripheral dose to remaining organs. The R-IMRT plan had a risk estimate of 4.56% when compared to the IMRT risk of 4.78%. For the complex prostate case, there was no significant difference in the lifetime risks of the IMRT (5.73%) and R-IMRT (5.74%) plans.
R-IMRT is an approximation to VMAT and it was found that there is no clinically significant difference between lifetime risk estimates between R-IMRT and standard seven-beam IMRT for the prostate.
对于某些临床应用,与静态、分步照射调强放疗(step-and-shoot IMRT)相比,容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)等旋转调强放疗(R-IMRT)技术能够更好地覆盖靶区剂量并缩短治疗时间。作者对专为西门子 Primus 直线加速器设计的两种标准分步照射调强放疗计划和两种分步照射旋转调强放疗计划进行了风险比较研究。
使用 RANDO 体模的 CT 图像生成 R-IMRT 和静态 IMRT 计划。创建了一个简单的前列腺病例和一个复杂的前列腺病例来研究这些技术。R-IMRT 计划由 72 个单节段 6 MV 射束组成,射束角度间隔为 5°,均匀分布。静态 IMRT 计划采用了 7 个多节段 6 MV 射束。两种类型的计划都使用 Pinnacle(3)中的直接机器参数优化(DMPO)算法进行优化,并使用相同的优化目标集。将计划输送到 RANDO 体模,并在体模的各个位置进行了热释光二极管(TLD)剂量测量。使用国际辐射防护委员会(ICRP)第 103 号出版物中定义的风险系数和器官权重,计算出各种危险器官的有效剂量以及两种技术的总体风险估计。
对于简单的前列腺病例,R-IMRT 技术在 CT 体积内为危险器官提供了更高的剂量,而对其余器官的总体外周剂量则更低。与 IMRT 的风险(4.78%)相比,R-IMRT 计划的风险估计值为 4.56%。对于复杂的前列腺病例,IMRT(5.73%)和 R-IMRT(5.74%)计划的终生风险没有显著差异。
R-IMRT 是 VMAT 的一种近似,对于前列腺,R-IMRT 和标准的七射束 IMRT 之间的终生风险估计值没有临床显著差异。