Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, Lafayette, IN 47907-2081, USA.
J Pers. 2012 Dec;80(6):1593-614. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00775.x.
Research has shown that the personality disorders (PDs) bear consistent relations to general models of personality functioning, particularly in relation to the Five-Factor Model (FFM). In addition to suggesting that the PDs might be understood as constellations of traits from the FFM, this research also suggests that these constellations might be used to assess the PDs. The present article reviews previous research using the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R; Costa & McCrae, ) to assess disordered personality and discusses some shortcomings of this approach. Next, I detail studies that have used what is known about the relations between the FFM and disordered personality to construct new assessments that are grounded in the basic science of personality but designed to assess the more pathological aspects. Finally, the advantages of this approach are outlined.
研究表明,人格障碍(PDs)与一般人格功能模型密切相关,尤其是与五因素模型(FFM)相关。除了表明 PDs 可以被理解为 FFM 特质的组合外,这项研究还表明,这些组合可以用于评估 PDs。本文回顾了使用 NEO 人格量表修订版(NEO PI-R;Costa & McCrae, )评估障碍性人格的先前研究,并讨论了这种方法的一些缺点。接下来,我详细介绍了使用 FFM 与障碍性人格之间的关系来构建新评估方法的研究,这些方法基于人格的基础科学,但旨在评估更病态的方面。最后,概述了这种方法的优势。