Han Xi-qin, Huang Hai-rong, Li Yan-jing, Yu Xia, Gao Jing-tao, Bi Zhi-qiang, Chu Nai-hui, Li Liang, Ma Yu
Department of Tuberculosis, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing 101149, China.
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2011 Oct;34(10):762-5.
To compare the antimycobacterial activities of rifampicin (RFP) and rifabutin (RBT), and to evaluate the correlation between RBT resistance and genetic alterations in the rpoB gene.
The microplate-based alamar blue assay (MABA) method was performed to detect the antimycobacterial activities of RFP and RBT in 168 strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis). Meanwhile, we also analyzed the 81 bp core region of rpoB gene by DNA sequencing. The rate of gene mutations was analyzed by chi-square test.
RBT was sensitive for all of the 66 RFP-sensitive strains with no mutations in 81 bp core region of rpoB gene. But of the 102 RFP-resistant strains, 76 strains were also resistant to RBT. Cross resistance between RFP and RBT was 74.5% (76/102). Alterations at codons 516, 526, 531 in the rpoB gene correlated with resistance to both RFP and RBT. While point mutations at codons 511 and 533 possibly influenced the susceptibility to RFP but not to RBT. The mutation rate (92.1%, 70/76) of rpoB gene of RBT-resistant strains was significantly higher than that (23.9%, 22/92) of RBT-sensitive strains (χ(2) = 78.12, P < 0.05).
RBT was more active against M. tuberculosis as compared to RFP. The RFP-resistant strains with MIC ≤ 4 mg/L were still susceptible to RBT. Our results suggest that analysis of genetic alterations in the rpoB gene is useful for predicting RFP-resistance, and may have implications for evaluating RBT-resistance.
比较利福平(RFP)和利福布汀(RBT)的抗分枝杆菌活性,并评估RBT耐药性与rpoB基因遗传改变之间的相关性。
采用基于微孔板的alamar蓝分析法(MABA)检测168株结核分枝杆菌(M. tuberculosis)中RFP和RBT的抗分枝杆菌活性。同时,通过DNA测序分析rpoB基因的81 bp核心区域。采用卡方检验分析基因突变率。
RBT对所有66株RFP敏感菌株均敏感,rpoB基因81 bp核心区域无突变。但在102株RFP耐药菌株中,76株对RBT也耐药。RFP与RBT之间的交叉耐药率为74.5%(76/102)。rpoB基因第516、526、531位密码子的改变与对RFP和RBT的耐药性相关。而第511和533位密码子的点突变可能影响对RFP的敏感性,但不影响对RBT的敏感性。RBT耐药菌株的rpoB基因突变率(92.1%,70/76)显著高于RBT敏感菌株(23.9%,22/92)(χ(2)=78.12,P<0.05)。
与RFP相比,RBT对结核分枝杆菌的活性更强。MIC≤4 mg/L的RFP耐药菌株对RBT仍敏感。我们的结果表明,分析rpoB基因的遗传改变有助于预测RFP耐药性,可能对评估RBT耐药性有意义。