Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Apr;93(4):636-40. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.002. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
To investigate movement of the center of mass (COM) during different gait training methods in people with neurologic conditions.
Coordination of the gait cycle, represented by mediolateral COM displacement amplitude, timing, and stability, was assessed during a variety of gait training methods performed in a single session.
Gait laboratory.
People who were unable to walk unassisted due to an acquired brain injury (n=17) and healthy control subjects (n=25).
The participants performed 7 alternative gait training methods in a randomized order. These were therapist manual facilitation, the use of a gait assistive device, treadmill walking with handrail support, and 4 variations of body weight-support treadmill training with combinations of handrail and/or therapist support.
Mediolateral COM movement was analyzed in terms of displacement amplitude (overall range of motion), timing (relative to stride time), and stability (steadiness of the movement). Normative values for these measures were acquired from 25 healthy participants walking at a self-selected comfortable pace.
Body weight-support treadmill training without any additional support resulted in significantly (P<.05) greater amplitude, altered timing, and reduced movement stability compared with nonpathologic gait. Allowing handrail support or therapist facilitation reduced this effect and resulted in treadmill training (± body weight support) having lower movement amplitudes when compared with the other training methods. Therapist manual facilitation most closely matched nonpathologic gait for timing and stability.
In the context of overall dynamic gait coordination, no single method of training provides the optimal stimulus. A training program that uses a variety of techniques may provide a beneficial rehabilitation response.
研究不同神经条件下的步态训练方法对质心(COM)运动的影响。
在单次治疗中,评估各种步态训练方法下步态周期的协调,以侧向 COM 位移幅度、时间和稳定性来表示。
步态实验室。
因获得性脑损伤而无法独立行走的人(n=17)和健康对照者(n=25)。
参与者以随机顺序进行 7 种不同的步态训练方法。这些方法包括治疗师手动辅助、使用助行器、扶手支持的跑步机行走,以及 4 种不同的减重跑步机训练方法,结合扶手和/或治疗师支持。
侧向 COM 运动分析了位移幅度(整体运动范围)、时间(相对于步幅时间)和稳定性(运动的稳定性)。这些措施的正常数值是从 25 名以自我选择的舒适速度行走的健康参与者中获得的。
与非病理步态相比,没有任何额外支撑的减重跑步机训练导致明显更大的幅度、改变的时间和降低的运动稳定性(P<.05)。允许扶手支撑或治疗师辅助可以减少这种影响,并导致跑步机训练(±体重支持)的运动幅度低于其他训练方法。治疗师手动辅助在时间和稳定性方面最接近非病理步态。
在整体动态步态协调的背景下,没有单一的训练方法能提供最佳刺激。使用多种技术的训练计划可能会提供有益的康复反应。