Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Jun;27(6):1234-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.021. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
This study compares the efficacy of pain control using continuous femoral nerve block (FNB) and multimodal periarticular soft tissue injection. This is a randomized, crossover, clinical trial. Sixteen patients having bilateral osteoarthritis of the knee scheduled for staged total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive either FNB (0.2% ropivacaine), via indwelling catheter for 72 hours, or multimodal periarticular soft tissue injection in the first stage. In the second stage, they received the opposite treatment. The primary outcome measure was morphine consumption by patient-controlled analgesia in the first 72 hours postoperatively. Cumulative morphine consumption as well as rest pain and motion pain in the first 72 hours was comparable between the 2 groups. The functional outcomes did not differ significantly. We conclude that multimodal periarticular soft tissue injection provides comparable analgesia to continuous FNB after total knee arthroplasty.
本研究比较了连续股神经阻滞(FNB)和关节周围多模式软组织注射在控制疼痛方面的疗效。这是一项随机、交叉、临床试验。16 名双侧膝关节骨关节炎患者拟行分期全膝关节置换术,随机分为 FNB(0.2%罗哌卡因)组和关节周围多模式软组织注射组。FNB 组采用留置导管持续镇痛 72 小时,关节周围多模式软组织注射组在第一阶段接受治疗。在第二阶段,他们接受了相反的治疗。主要观察指标是术后 72 小时内患者自控镇痛的吗啡消耗量。两组术后 72 小时内累积吗啡消耗量、静息痛和运动痛无显著差异。功能结局无显著差异。我们的结论是,全膝关节置换术后关节周围多模式软组织注射与连续 FNB 提供的镇痛效果相当。