Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
J Physiol. 2012 Apr 15;590(8):1849-69. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.222083. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
We tested the hypothesis that vasomotor control is differentially regulated between feed arteries and downstream arterioles from the cremaster muscle of C57BL/6 mice. In isolated pressurized arteries, confocal Ca(2+) imaging of smooth muscle cells (SMCs) revealed Ca(2+) sparks and Ca(2+) waves. Ryanodine receptor (RyR) antagonists (ryanodine and tetracaine) inhibited both sparks and waves but increased global Ca(2+) and myogenic tone. In arterioles, SMCs exhibited only Ca(2+) waves that were insensitive to ryanodine or tetracaine. Pharmacological interventions indicated that RyRs are functionally coupled to large-conductance, Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels (BK(Ca)) in SMCs of arteries, whereas BK(Ca) appear functionally coupled to voltage-gated Ca2+ channels in SMCs of arterioles. Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R) antagonists (xestospongin D or 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate) or a phospholipase C inhibitor (U73122) attenuated Ca(2+) waves, global Ca(2+) and myogenic tone in arteries and arterioles but had no effect on arterial sparks. Real-time PCR of isolated SMCs revealed RyR2 as the most abundant isoform transcript; arteries expressed twice the RyR2 but only 65% the RyR3 of arterioles and neither vessel expressed RyR1. Immunofluorescent localisation of RyR protein indicated bright, clustered staining of arterial SMCs in contrast to diffuse staining in arteriolar SMCs. Expression of IP(3)R transcripts and protein immunofluorescence were similar in SMCs of both vessels with IP(3)R1>>IP(3)R2>IP(3)R3. Despite similar expression of IP(3)Rs and dependence of Ca(2+) waves on IP(3)Rs, these data illustrate pronounced regional heterogeneity in function and expression of RyRs between SMCs of the same vascular resistance network. We conclude that vasomotor control is differentially regulated in feed arteries vs. downstream arterioles.
我们检验了一个假说,即血管舒缩控制在来自 C57BL/6 小鼠的提睾肌的馈送动脉和下游小动脉之间是不同调节的。在分离的加压动脉中,平滑肌细胞(SMC)的共聚焦 Ca(2+)成像揭示了 Ca(2+)火花和 Ca(2+)波。Ryanodine 受体(RyR)拮抗剂(ryanodine 和 tetracaine)抑制了火花和波,但增加了整体 Ca(2+)和肌源性张力。在小动脉中,SMC 仅表现出对 Ryanodine 或 Tetracaine 不敏感的 Ca(2+)波。药理学干预表明,RyRs 在动脉 SMC 中与大电导、Ca(2+)激活的 K(+)通道(BK(Ca))功能偶联,而 BK(Ca)在小动脉 SMC 中似乎与电压门控 Ca2+通道功能偶联。肌醇 1,4,5-三磷酸受体(IP3R)拮抗剂(xestospongin D 或 2-氨基乙氧基二苯硼酸)或磷脂酶 C 抑制剂(U73122)减弱了 Ca(2+)波、整体 Ca(2+)和肌源性张力在动脉和小动脉中,但对动脉火花没有影响。分离的 SMC 的实时 PCR 显示 RyR2 是最丰富的同工型转录本;动脉表达的 RyR2 是小动脉的两倍,但仅表达 65%的 RyR3,而且两种血管都不表达 RyR1。RyR 蛋白的免疫荧光定位表明,动脉 SMC 呈现明亮、簇状染色,而小动脉 SMC 则呈现弥散染色。两种血管的 SMC 中 IP(3)R 转录本和蛋白免疫荧光的表达相似,IP(3)R1>>IP(3)R2>IP(3)R3。尽管 IP(3)Rs 的表达相似,且 Ca(2+)波依赖于 IP(3)Rs,但这些数据表明,同一血管阻力网络中的 SMC 之间 RyR 的功能和表达存在明显的区域性异质性。我们得出结论,血管舒缩控制在馈送动脉和下游小动脉之间是不同调节的。