Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Cancer. 2012 Sep 15;118(18):4478-85. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26585. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
The potential role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for patients who have completely resected, stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with N2 disease remains controversial. By using population-based data, the authors of this report compared the survival of a concurrent cohort of elderly patients who had N2 disease treated with and without PORT.
By using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry linked to Medicare records, 1307 patients were identified who had stage III NSCLC with N2 lymph node involvement diagnosed between 1992 and 2005. Propensity scoring methods and instrumental variable analysis were used to compare the survival of patients who did and did not receive PORT after controlling for selection bias.
Overall, 710 patients (54%) received PORT. Propensity score analysis indicated that PORT was not associated with improved survival in patients with N2 disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.27). Analyses that were limited to patients who did or did not receive chemotherapy, who received intermediate-complexity or high-complexity radiotherapy planning, or adjusted for time trends produced similar results. The instrumental variable estimator for the absolute improvement in 1-year and 3-year survival with PORT was -0.04 (95% CI, -0.15 to 0.08) and -0.08 (95% CI, -0.24 to 0.15), respectively.
The current data suggested that PORT is not associated with improved survival for elderly patients with N2 disease. These findings have important clinical implications, because SEER data indicate that a large percentage of elderly patients currently receive PORT despite the lack of definitive evidence about its effectiveness. The potential effectiveness of PORT should be evaluated further in randomized controlled trials.
对于完全切除、N2 期 III 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的患者,术后放疗(PORT)的潜在作用仍存在争议。本研究作者利用基于人群的数据,比较了一组接受和未接受 PORT 治疗的 N2 期老年患者的生存情况。
作者使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)登记处与医疗保险记录相关联,确定了 1992 年至 2005 年间诊断为 N2 期 NSCLC 且淋巴结受累的 1307 例患者。采用倾向评分法和工具变量分析,在控制选择偏倚的情况下,比较接受和未接受 PORT 治疗的患者的生存情况。
总体而言,710 例患者(54%)接受了 PORT。倾向评分分析表明,PORT 并未改善 N2 期患者的生存(风险比[HR],1.11;95%置信区间[CI],0.97-1.27)。仅对接受或未接受化疗、接受中复杂度或高复杂度放疗计划的患者进行分析,或对时间趋势进行调整,也得到了类似的结果。PORT 治疗后 1 年和 3 年生存率绝对提高的工具变量估计值分别为-0.04(95%CI,-0.15 至 0.08)和-0.08(95%CI,-0.24 至 0.15)。
目前的数据表明,PORT 并不能改善 N2 期老年患者的生存。这些发现具有重要的临床意义,因为 SEER 数据表明,尽管缺乏其疗效的确凿证据,但目前仍有很大比例的老年患者接受 PORT。PORT 的潜在疗效应在随机对照试验中进一步评估。