Queen's University School of Medicine, Kingston, Ont.
Can J Ophthalmol. 2012 Feb;47(1):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2011.12.006.
To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel multimedia learning tool (MMLT) for teaching a method of approaching common ophthalmologic presentations.
Randomized clinical study.
25 second-year medical students at Queen's University.
We evaluated 2 MMLTs pertaining to common ophthalmologic presentations--acute visual loss and cataract--through the use of a randomized clinical study. Subjects were randomized either to watch a short-form video or to read a textbook excerpt for both cataract and acute visual loss. If randomized to one MMLT for the first module, the subject was allocated to the other modality for the second module. The main outcomes of interest were knowledge retention as measured by a short multiple-choice questionnaire, efficiency, and user preference.
A trend was noted whereby subjects randomized to an MMLT had higher composite scores on multiple-choice questionnaires (mean score MMLT = 75.2% vs text = 67.5%; t test = 1.535; df = 22; p value = 0.139). Additionally, those who watched an MMLT spent 72% less time reviewing the education content (29 min vs 8 min; t test = 3.955, p value = 0.0003). Of the sample, 87% preferred the MMLT over the text.
MMLTs can significantly reduce learning time without sacrificing knowledge retention in undergraduate students of ophthalmology.
评估一种新型多媒体学习工具(MMLT)在教授常见眼科表现方法方面的有效性。
随机临床研究。
25 名皇后大学二年级医学生。
我们通过随机临床研究评估了两种与常见眼科表现(急性视力丧失和白内障)相关的 MMLT。受试者被随机分配观看短格式视频或阅读有关白内障和急性视力丧失的教科书节选。如果第一个模块随机分配到一种 MMLT,则该受试者将被分配到第二个模块的另一种方式。主要感兴趣的结果是通过简短的多项选择问卷衡量的知识保留、效率和用户偏好。
注意到一个趋势,即随机分配到 MMLT 的受试者在多项选择问卷上的综合得分较高(MMLT 的平均得分=75.2%,文本=67.5%;t 检验=1.535,df=22,p 值=0.139)。此外,观看 MMLT 的人复习教育内容的时间减少了 72%(29 分钟与 8 分钟;t 检验=3.955,p 值=0.0003)。在样本中,87%的人更喜欢 MMLT 而不是文本。
MMLT 可以在不牺牲眼科本科生知识保留的情况下显著减少学习时间。