Department of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
J Biomech. 2012 Apr 30;45(7):1259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.036. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
Little is known about the landing behavior of the trailing (recovery) foot and ensuing types of falls following a forward slip in walking. The purposes of this study were to (1) determine if community-dwelling older adults experienced bilateral slips at the same rate as had been previously observed for young adults during over-ground walking; (2) determine if fall rate in older adults was dependent on slip type (unilateral vs. bilateral); and (3) identify differences in spatiotemporal variables of the trailing leg step between unilateral and bilateral slips. One-hundred-seventy-four participants experienced an unannounced, unrehearsed slip while walking on a 7-m walkway. Each trial was monitored with a motion capture system and bilateral ground reaction force plates. Although the experimental design, developed with original data from a young adult population, favored bilateral slips, more older adults (35%) than anticipated (10% previously observed in young, p<0.001) displayed a unilateral slip. The probability of fall was equal in the two types of slips. Eighty-two people recovered from the slip, while the remaining 92 (53%) fell. These 92 were classified into two exclusive categories based on the heel distance at the time of fall arrest using cluster analysis: those which resembled a fall into a "splits" position (n=47) or a feet-forward fall (n=45). All (100%) unilateral slips led to splits falls, as expected. Yet, not all bilateral slips (only 83%) resulted in feet-forward falls. A longer forward recovery step with a prolonged step time led to both feet slipping, nearly together, hence a feet-forward fall.
对于在行走中向前滑倒后尾随(恢复)脚的着地行为以及随后的跌倒类型,人们知之甚少。本研究的目的是:(1) 确定社区居住的老年人在进行地面行走时是否像年轻人那样经历双侧滑倒的频率;(2) 确定老年人的跌倒率是否取决于滑倒类型(单侧与双侧);(3) 确定单侧和双侧滑倒时尾随腿步的时空变量差异。174 名参与者在 7 米长的步行道上意外且未经排练地经历了滑倒。每个试验都使用运动捕捉系统和双侧地面反力板进行监测。虽然实验设计是基于年轻人的原始数据制定的,有利于双侧滑倒,但更多的老年人(35%)而不是预期的(10%之前在年轻人中观察到,p<0.001)表现为单侧滑倒。两种类型的滑倒的跌倒概率相等。82 人从滑倒中恢复,而其余 92 人(53%)跌倒。这些 92 人根据跌倒时脚跟距离使用聚类分析分为两个独立类别:那些类似于“劈叉”姿势跌倒的人(n=47)或脚向前跌倒的人(n=45)。正如预期的那样,所有(100%)单侧滑倒都导致了劈叉跌倒。然而,并非所有的双侧滑倒(仅 83%)都会导致脚向前跌倒。向前恢复的步幅较长且步时延长,会导致双脚几乎同时滑倒,从而导致脚向前跌倒。