• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者教育计划预防住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症。

Patient education program for venous thromboembolism prevention in hospitalized patients.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2012 Mar;125(3):258-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.09.012.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.09.012
PMID:22340923
Abstract

PURPOSE

Up to 15% of clinician-ordered doses of injectable pharmacological prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism are not administered. Patient refusal accounts for nearly 50% of these omitted doses. We conducted a prospective cohort study to determine whether a patient education program would improve medication adherence to clinician-ordered injectable prophylactic anticoagulation.

METHODS

We identified 528 hospitalized patients ordered to receive injectable pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. We evaluated the impact of pharmacist-led patient education sessions on medication adherence (defined as the ratio of doses administered to doses scheduled) compared with our historical cohort.

RESULTS

Individualized patient education sessions were conducted within 24 hours of the initial order for prophylactic anticoagulation in 99% of patients. Adherence to clinician-ordered pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis was higher after the patient education program than in our historical cohort (94.4% vs 89.9%, P <.0001). The proportion of patients receiving 100% of scheduled doses of injectable pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis was higher after our novel patient education program than in our historical cohort (73.7% vs 62.4%, P=.001). Patient refusal as a reason for omitted doses was less frequent after the patient education program (29.3% vs 43.7%, P=.001).

CONCLUSION

Pharmacist-led individualized patient education sessions were associated with higher medication adherence to clinician-ordered injectable pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and a reduction in patient refusal as a reason for omitted doses. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a patient education program on medication adherence to pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis is warranted.

摘要

目的

高达 15%的临床医生开具的用于预防静脉血栓栓塞症的注射用药物预防剂量未被给予。这些遗漏剂量中近 50%是由于患者拒绝。我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以确定患者教育计划是否会提高对临床医生开具的注射用预防性抗凝药物的依从性。

方法

我们确定了 528 名接受注射用药物性静脉血栓栓塞症预防治疗的住院患者。我们评估了药师主导的患者教育课程对药物依从性(定义为给予的剂量与计划剂量的比值)的影响,与我们的历史队列进行比较。

结果

在 99%的患者中,在最初开具预防性抗凝治疗医嘱后的 24 小时内进行了个体化的患者教育课程。与我们的历史队列相比,在接受患者教育计划后,对临床医生开具的药物性静脉血栓栓塞症预防治疗的依从性更高(94.4%比 89.9%,P<0.0001)。在接受我们新的患者教育计划后,接受 100%计划剂量注射用药物性静脉血栓栓塞症预防治疗的患者比例高于我们的历史队列(73.7%比 62.4%,P=0.001)。在接受患者教育计划后,由于患者拒绝而遗漏剂量的比例较低(29.3%比 43.7%,P=0.001)。

结论

药师主导的个体化患者教育课程与更高的药物依从性有关,临床医生开具的注射用药物性静脉血栓栓塞症预防治疗以及由于患者拒绝而遗漏剂量的情况减少。需要进行一项随机对照试验,以评估患者教育计划对药物性静脉血栓栓塞症预防治疗的药物依从性的影响。

相似文献

1
Patient education program for venous thromboembolism prevention in hospitalized patients.患者教育计划预防住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症。
Am J Med. 2012 Mar;125(3):258-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.09.012.
2
Adherence to pharmacological thromboprophylaxis orders in hospitalized patients.住院患者对药物性血栓预防医嘱的遵从情况。
Am J Med. 2010 Jun;123(6):536-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.11.017.
3
A cross-sectional evaluation of venous thromboembolism risk and use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized patients in Senegal.塞内加尔住院患者静脉血栓栓塞风险及预防的横断面评估。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Oct;104(10):493-501. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2011.05.007. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
4
Nonadministration of medication doses for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in a cohort of hospitalized patients.一组住院患者未进行静脉血栓栓塞预防用药剂量的给药情况。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Mar 15;75(6):392-397. doi: 10.2146/ajhp161057.
5
Patient preferences regarding pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.患者对药物性静脉血栓栓塞预防的偏好。
J Hosp Med. 2015 Feb;10(2):108-11. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2282. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
6
Assessing anticoagulation knowledge in patients new to warfarin therapy.评估新接受华法林治疗患者的抗凝知识。
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Jul-Aug;44(7-8):1152-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P092. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
7
Knowledge of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention among hospitalized patients.住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)预防知识
J Vasc Nurs. 2008 Dec;26(4):109-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2008.09.005.
8
Venous thromboembolism pharmacy intervention management program with an active, multifaceted approach reduces preventable venous thromboembolism and increases appropriate prophylaxis.采用积极、多方位的静脉血栓栓塞症药学干预管理方案可降低可预防的静脉血栓栓塞症发生率并提高预防措施的恰当性。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):45-58. doi: 10.1177/1076029611405186. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
9
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized heart failure patients.住院心力衰竭患者的静脉血栓栓塞预防
J Card Fail. 2008 Mar;14(2):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2007.10.017.
10
A unit-based intervention aimed at improving patient adherence to pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.一项旨在提高患者对药物性血栓预防依从性的基于单位的干预措施。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Oct;24(10):654-60. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003992. Epub 2015 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptance of artificial intelligence clinical assistant decision support system to prevent and control venous thromboembolism among healthcare workers: an extend Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model.医护人员对预防和控制静脉血栓栓塞的人工智能临床辅助决策支持系统的接受度:扩展的技术接受与使用统一理论模型
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 11;12:1475577. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1475577. eCollection 2025.
2
A Review of the Preventive Strategies for Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients.住院患者静脉血栓栓塞预防策略综述
Cureus. 2023 Nov 7;15(11):e48421. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48421. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Understanding healthcare workers' knowledge and attitudes regarding the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine: Overcoming gaps to improve public health response.
了解医护人员对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗的知识和态度:克服差距以改善公共卫生应对措施。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Dec 15;2(1):e200. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.335. eCollection 2022.
4
Awareness and Perception of Hospitalized Patients on Thromboembolism and Thromboprophylaxis: A Cross-Sectional Study in Sana'a-Yemen.住院患者对血栓栓塞和血栓预防的认知与感知:也门萨那的一项横断面研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Jul 11;16:1649-1661. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S368839. eCollection 2022.
5
Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial to Examine the Pharmacokinetic and Clinical Impacts of Fixed Dose versus Weight-based Enoxaparin Prophylaxis: A Methodologic Description of the FIxed or Variable Enoxaparin (FIVE) Trial.双盲随机临床试验:探究固定剂量与基于体重的依诺肝素预防方案的药代动力学及临床影响——固定或可变依诺肝素(FIVE)试验的方法学描述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Apr 11;7(4):e2185. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002185. eCollection 2019 Apr.
6
What the 2018 ASH venous thromboembolism guidelines omitted: nonadministration of pharmacologic prophylaxis in hospitalized patients.2018年美国血液学会静脉血栓栓塞指南遗漏的内容:住院患者未进行药物预防
Blood Adv. 2019 Feb 26;3(4):596-598. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018030510.
7
Effect of Real-time Patient-Centered Education Bundle on Administration of Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Hospitalized Patients.实时以患者为中心的教育套餐对住院患者静脉血栓栓塞预防管理的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184741. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4741.
8
Multi-institution Evaluation of Adherence to Comprehensive Postoperative VTE Chemoprophylaxis.多机构评估术后静脉血栓栓塞症综合预防治疗的依从性。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jun;271(6):1072-1079. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003124.
9
Principles and theory guiding development and delivery of patient education in disorders of thrombosis and hemostasis: Reviewing the current literature.指导血栓形成和止血紊乱患者教育发展与实施的原则和理论:回顾当前文献
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2017 Sep 20;1(2):162-171. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12030. eCollection 2017 Oct.
10
Effectiveness of two distinct web-based education tools for bedside nurses on medication administration practice for venous thromboembolism prevention: A randomized clinical trial.两种不同的基于网络的教育工具对床边护士预防静脉血栓栓塞症用药实践的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 16;12(8):e0181664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181664. eCollection 2017.