GI Endoscopy Unit, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.037.
Tandem colonoscopy is regarded as the reference standard for the evaluation of the adenoma detection rate (ADR) and adenoma miss rate (AMR) during colonoscopy. Pooled results from previous tandem studies yield AMRs of 22%. The AMR of trainees is important to estimate the number of colonoscopies required to develop competence in screening for colorectal neoplasms.
To measure the ADR and AMR of trainees as a function of experience.
Prospective tandem colonoscopy study at an academic VA medical center. A trainee initially attempted colonoscopy. If the trainee was able to intubate the cecum, the trainee performed the withdrawal, and the colonoscopy was then repeated by the attending physician to assess the AMR.
Twelve trainee endoscopists were included in the study. Trainees had between 0 and 33 months of previous endoscopic experience and had done between 0 and 605 previous colonoscopies. A total of 230 patients were evaluated for the study, and 218 patients were enrolled. Complete tandem colonoscopy was performed in 147 patients. There was a 54% ADR. The mean (standard deviation) size of the adenomas in the cohort was 5.9 (5.3) mm. Significant variables in multivariate logistic regression analysis for missed adenomas were trainee experience (P = .011) and patient age (P < .001). The AMR decreased with increasing experience, and it is estimated that 450 colonoscopies are required to attain AMRs of less than 25% in a 60-year-old patient.
Single-center study; the attending physician performing the second pass was not blinded to the first pass. The AMR was only analyzed for cases in which the trainee was able to reach the cecum with no or minimal assistance.
Our tandem colonoscopy study demonstrates that the AMR decreases as the experience of trainees increases and is a late competency attained during training. Future training may need to incorporate these findings to serve as a basis for determining appropriate training guidelines.
经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术被认为是评估腺瘤检出率(ADR)和腺瘤漏诊率(AMR)的参考标准。之前的经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术研究的汇总结果显示 AMR 为 22%。评估学员的 AMR 对于估计发展筛查结直肠肿瘤能力所需的结肠镜检查数量很重要。
测量学员的 ADR 和 AMR 随经验的变化。
在学术退伍军人事务医疗中心进行前瞻性经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术研究。一名学员首先尝试进行结肠镜检查。如果学员能够将盲肠插管,学员将进行退出操作,然后由主治医生重复进行结肠镜检查,以评估 AMR。
本研究纳入了 12 名学员内镜医生。学员的内镜经验在 0 至 33 个月之间,之前进行的结肠镜检查在 0 至 605 次之间。共有 230 名患者接受了研究评估,其中 218 名患者入组。147 名患者完成了完整的经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术。ADR 为 54%。该队列中腺瘤的平均(标准差)大小为 5.9(5.3)mm。多变量逻辑回归分析中,漏诊腺瘤的显著变量是学员经验(P=0.011)和患者年龄(P<0.001)。随着经验的增加,AMR 下降,估计在 60 岁的患者中,需要进行 450 次结肠镜检查才能使 AMR 低于 25%。
单中心研究;进行第二次检查的主治医生对第一次检查没有盲法。仅对学员能够无或最小程度辅助到达盲肠的病例进行 AMR 分析。
我们的经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术研究表明,随着学员经验的增加,AMR 下降,这是培训过程中晚期获得的能力。未来的培训可能需要纳入这些发现,作为确定适当培训指南的基础。